User talk:Bcp67

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - crz crztalk 21:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2022–23 Top14 season


A tag has been placed on Category:2022–23 Top14 season indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk  18:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rugby union clubs disestablished in 2015


A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby union clubs disestablished in 2015 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Lester Piggott
FYI: Lester Piggott is a candidate for In The News. Seth Whales  talk  09:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:August 2020 sports events in Canada


A tag has been placed on Category:August 2020 sports events in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Wrong categorisation
Please remove the erroneous Asquith family category from this page. John Jolliffe who was Bodley’s librarian has nothing to do with the Asquiths. He has born in Hastings in 1929, parents Willam Benjamin Jolliffe and Gwendolen Ada Mary Gadd. He was my father and I am going to undo the edits that have conflated his entry with someone else MaryPercival (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you not able to remove it yourself? --Bcp67 (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rugby union clubs disestablished in 2015


A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby union clubs disestablished in 2015 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rugby clubs disestablished in 2015


A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby clubs disestablished in 2015 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Notable Race page rejected
Hello. Many thanks for the info you provided for the Contenders Hurdle and the excellent quotation from Nicky Henderson. I am having difficulties getting a new page Draft:Edward_Hanmer_Memorial_Chase published. This race was clearly a major part of the Chasing scene in the eighties (my favourite period) and the precursor of the Betfair Chase, but apparently I have not made a sufficient case for it to be "notable". Similarly it seems my references from Timeform and Racing Post are no longer sufficiently reliable! Any help you can give will be gratefully received. (JockeyColours (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC))
 * Like you the 80s are my favourite racing period and I can remember the Edward Hanmer as a significant race - I hadn't figured that the Betfair Chase was developed out of it, but it makes sense now. For some reason, people don't seem to like the RP and Timeform results as establishing notability and while you and I know which races were notable, it's sometimes hard to prove it with sources. I'm not around for a few days but will have a look next week and see if I can find anything to support the notability of the race. Sad to see the Contenders Hurdle disappear, I used to go to that meeting a lot and the 2m hurdle and the Gainsborough were big Cheltenham trials in those times. Now one has gone and the other is a standard handicap. --Bcp67 (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @JockeyColours I have added a couple of bits of into to the draft mentioning Gold Cup winners, with references. Hopefully might help a bit. Bcp67 (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1703 in sports


A tag has been placed on Category:1703 in sports indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 Currie Cup


A tag has been placed on Category:2023 Currie Cup indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Bcp67. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ABcp67 granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 14:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Timeform
Hi, I wonder if you can answer this for me: does a Timeform master rating for a filly or mare include the weight-for-sex allowance? Or does it need to be added? For instance, TF's recent Breeders Cup review on the Sporting Life says "plus [allowance...]". Might that be slightly careless wording, i.e. should read "including allowance?" My reason for asking is that if the female master rating needs the allowance added, then the likes of Indian Skimmer, rated a very good 133, would be a 136+ horse. Thanks Billsmith60 (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * That's an interesting one, and one I don't know the answer to! I've had a look at Timeform's website and their ratings explanation, and I think their master ratings don't include any sex allowance - "It is important to mention that all ratings are at weight-for-age, so that equal ratings mean horses of equal merit. Another way of looking at it is to see the universal rating handicap as four handicaps side by side: one for two-year-olds, one for three-yearolds, one for four-year-olds and one for older horses."  So I would say if you had a four-year-old colt and filly both rated 100, and the colt carries 9 stone and the filly 8 st 11,  the filly is better in at the weights.  But the actual master rating would still be 100 for both of them. Does that help? Bcp67 (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I forgot about seeing that explanation on their website. But "It is important to mention that all ratings are at weight-for-age, *so that equal ratings mean horses of equal merit."* seems clear enough (the weight allowance *is part of the master rating). With the highest-rated filly ever, Allez France from memory, being 'only' 137, Timeform are arguing that no filly is near being in the top 15 or so all-time greats at 140+ or even in the top echelon of truly outstanding horses at 138 and 139. I find that a bit hard to believe. Ta Billsmith60 (talk)• Billsmith60 (talk) 16:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Bcp67! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Proposed deletion of Esher Novices' Chase


The article Esher Novices' Chase has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lacking sufficient sourcing to demonstrate notability per WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Under 20 Rugby Championship has been nominated for merging
Category:Under 20 Rugby Championship has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Archived ESPNcricinfo pages
FYI: A somewhat annoying issue regarding the above has just come to my attention. Please see here. Edwin of Northumbria (talk) 03:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Pretty Polly Stakes
Hello. There are two "supports" and no opposition for my proposal to move the above article, so as we're over six days since I made it would you go ahead and make the changes you said you could - and close the discussion? That would be much appreciated. I hope I've waited long enough. All the best, Billsmith60 (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * No-one's objected. I'll do the move later on today. Bcp67 (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Cheers Billsmith60 (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rugby clubs disestablished in 2006


A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby clubs disestablished in 2006 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)