User talk:Bdeeep

January 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mafia (party game). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for assuming this was "vandalism". Mafia is a game I play often on many sites and this book is spoken of often, just because you don't know something does not mean it does not exist and just because you are not certain on information does not mean it was vandalsim. Your message comes off as arrogant and accusatory, which I would think is not the tone one should take to a new contributor.

Don't bother answering, if I can figure out how to delete this account I will, if not i'll change the password and never return. I am also stopping my annual donations as well. I like this site a lot, but I don't appreciate being treated like a criminal without the simple courtesy of contact and discussion beforehand. Even removing it was fine, but do me the courtesy of asking for some sort of verification or discuss the edit with me before you accuse me of nefarious activity.

FROM YOUR OWN MESSAGE: ''Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting patent nonsense into a page. Vandalism is prohibited.

''Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing.

You not only determined without any discussion that YOU think the information was not valid, but also seem to have magically gleaned my intent (clearly required for vandalism) without to much as a word to me. Either you are pyschic, or perhaps you jumped the gun just a tad here with your accusations.

It is sad that politness, respect, and courtesy have disappeared behind faceless internet aliases.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politeness

good day
 * I'm sorry you feel this way. Your edits added unsourced material, which was removed per WP:VERIFY. You are welcome to locate proper sourcing and re-add the material. For the record, the message that I left for you states that your edits "-appear- to be vandalism"(emphasis added). There is no statement, nor assumption nor accusation that they -are- vandalism, and you should not take it as such. If you are editing in good faith then you are welcome to continue doing so, but please review the links I have provided. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)