User talk:Be-with

February 2013
Hello, I'm CT Cooper. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Eurovision Song Contest 2013 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that we don't delete content just because its old news - articles are written from historical perspective, and don't just report the most recent news. Please review WP:RECENTISM. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 18:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Vodka
Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Vodka. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 23:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Can you please explain why you seem to be repeatedly trying to change the Vodka article to emphasize Russia and de-emphasize Poland? You seem to be making repeated edits that multiple other people disagree with, and not providing any real explanation of why you want to make the changes. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at vodka. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. oknazevad (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Vodka. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 22:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Buk missile system, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 20:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)