User talk:BeBaFa

Status and Advice
Please see the advice on Translation. The article you translated on Mikhail Stanislavovich Kaniskin is not readable English--and it does not follow the standard conventions on links to ohter WP articles-- see WP:Links

For example "In 2007, Malakov wore the married couple (Elisa Carillo Cabrera and Mikhail Stanislavovich Kaniskin) as principal dancer to Berlin." even the Google translation as "In 2007 the then director of the Berlin state ballet Vladimir Malakhow called the couple (Elisa Carillo Cabrera and Michail Stanislavowitsch Kaniskin) as dancers to Berlin. " is better, with a clear meaning, even though it does not read as fully idiomatic English.

In addition, the personal life section uses adjectives of praise --I don't know what the rule is in the deWP, but the enWP does not do this.

Please rewrite, or ask for assistance.  DGG ( talk ) 00:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johannes Öhman (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Johannes Öhman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Johannes Öhman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Johannes_%C3%96hman Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Davisonio&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Johannes_%C3%96hman reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Xenia Wiest moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Xenia Wiest, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). As this is a blp (bio of a living person), almost every assertion should have a reference and a footnote. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:40, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Xenia Wiest moved to draftspace
I fear the sourcing isn't sufficient yet. We need in-depth coverage by a preponderance of independent, third-party sources to establish notability. Based on her work, I'm pretty sure she can clear the notability hurdle, but that needs to be demonstrated with explicit references. Her own website and the Staatsballett site are not suitable for this - these are good for sourcing facts, but not for showing notability.

It appears that Ballett Journal has covered her multiple times. If you can specifically reference instances (i.e., don't just reference the tag search page) and these are suitably in-depth (i.e., not just passing mentions), that might do it. Further coverage by unrelated newspapers, magazines etc. would also be useful.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Johannes Öhman


Hello, BeBaFa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Johannes Öhman.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Xenia Wiest


Hello, BeBaFa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xenia Wiest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mikhail Kaniskin


Hello, BeBaFa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mikhail Kaniskin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)