User talk:BeBeDahl

November 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Helmut Berger has been reverted. Your edit here to Helmut Berger was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.facebook.com/officialhelmutberfanpage) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm KAP03. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bobby Beausoleil have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 20:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bobby Beausoleil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 20:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Bobby Beausoleil edits
As per your request, I left you a message on your talk page and said I was putting back the information in order for it to be referenced in regards to that message as well as asking for further wiki support. I don’t understand why this could be considered vandalism especially since it clearly states on Bobby Beausoleil’s page that much of the information needs to be validated.

I’ll be copying and pasting what a wrote to you here in case you missed it on your talk page.

BeBeDahl BeBeDahl (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Original message
Received your message. Was it an automated message? Being a knowledgeable art culture historian and a good writer, I am dismayed by the suggestion that I should go fool around in the sandbox. As I noted when making the new entries, much of the existing information is erroneous, laced with hysterical pop culture hyperbole. I am very familiar with Bobby Beausoleil’s history and his body of artworks and I am attempting to correct the record in relation to him.

I would like to have wiki’s support in these efforts. You will note that I have been using proper citations in correcting the information. Only modest changes were made, again, properly cited. For example, Beausoleil’s father was not a milkman and he did not go to a reform school.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Again, I hope for your support.

BeBeDahl

P.S. I will reinsert my edits so that you can review them in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeBeDahl (talk • contribs) 19:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC) BeBeDahl (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)