User talk:BeFlux

Welcome
Hello, BeFlux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been deleted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Calaka (talk) 12:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Edited the article
Hi Calaka,

Thanks for the constructive comment. Yes, I am related with Cavalier. Yet, I tried to be as neutral as possible.

I added the categories.

The items about sugar or sugarfree chocolate and their respective advantages or disadvantages in this article are deleted. I will write a documented piece in the existing article about chocolate, refering to literature on the topic. In the chocolate article health issues are discussed, but these health issues are actually related with sugar, not with chocolate (cocoa) as such. I'll see what I can do.

I agree that this way, the article about Cavalier is less like an advertisement. I suppose that this way, there is no need anymore for external references? Therefore, and as the discussed content is removed, I removed these tags:

As I use wikipedia a lot, I want to contribute in the most qualitative way as possible.

Open to your suggestions, Thanks!

BeFlux (talk) 19:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello and thank you very much for the reply. Let me tell you that I appreciate you replying and trying to address the issues of the article (which I tagged). It is a nice change from the many articles I tag and then the creator simply removes the tags with out addressing the issue and then they get surprised why the article gets deleted. Anyway the general rule of thumb is that if you claim something on Wikipedia, there better be a reference that can back it up. Now in order to solidify the article (and prevent from others wanting to delete it) would you be able to add a few more references to it? The one you currently have is fine but more quality references = GOOD. Furthermore, the references do not have to be in English and they don't even have to be on the internet if you are having trouble finding them. More references ensures that the article stays here on Wikipedia and does not get deleted for being non-notable. Thank you and I hope to see you contribute more to Wikipedia.Calaka (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)