User talk:BeRhino

Hmmm...
I find it incredibly suspicious that a brand new editor would know about wiki-terms such as weasel words and non-reliable sources and performs exactly ten edits before contributing to a semi-protected article. Especially when the new editor enters an ongoing debate with an opinion that is very similar to one that banned editor previously had. According to Wikipedia's banning policy, the edits of a banned user are unwanted and can be reverted by anyone at anytime without discussion. By way of the duck test, I am almost certain this is the previously mentioned banned user on a new account, which can easily be determined with a CheckUser request. If you would like to come clean right now and admit that you are a sock puppet, I will not run a CheckUser or report you to an administrator just yet. You have made some perfectly valid edits, you just cannot grasp the basic guidelines here. As long as you follow the policies, I will let you proceed with caution. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * New editor and new account are two different things. Sock accounts should be blocked on the spot according to the policies you claim to have read. I am the one trying to be nice here and give you a second chance. Fezmar9 (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet
You have been. (blocked by MuZemike 22:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.