User talk:Beach1052

Hi! Sorry about deleting your John Greer article so curtly, but it did seem to be in violation of our guidelines. Please check out WP:VANITY, then go ahead and recreate your article. I'll give you plenty of time to polish it, then we'll see where we stand.

And welcome aboard! ➥the Epopt 18:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I think I have finished, I hope it is ok. All I am trying to do is give interested voters a quick non self serving snapshot of who I am so that they can make a decision on their own. I will never put my own policy issues for the election in here, I just wanted people that do not know me to have the most basic information of one of their candidates. let me know if this is ok.


 * I am assuming that since the page is gone again that it does not meet your criteria and that is fine. does not most of the incumbants page fall under the vanity rules as well? it can be seen at Sandra Bussin

I've undeleted it. Please edit the article so that it begins with an assertion of notability; i.e., why the world should care about John Greer. I suggest a beginning along the lines of "John Greer is Canadian politician notable for his support for moose rights...." (Please forgive the silly example.) ➥the Epopt 19:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello. I deleted the article John Greer because it appeared to meet criteria A7 for speedy deletion.  In general deletion requires a review by the entire Wikipedia community before deletion (this is done at WP:AFD), but there are a list of criteria at Criteria for speedy deletion were any administrator is able to delete an article on site.  The message aboe indicates the article has been undeleted, so I will leave it alone. --Allen3 talk 19:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)