User talk:Beachbum69

Tea Party movement edits
Your recent edit is marred by a dishonest comment. It is not minor. You did not just fix a typo.

I strongly suggest that you revert it yourself, before I report you and get you blocked for vandalism. Dylan Flaherty (talk) 04:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Reverted the change already - no reason for it to remain, especially given the dishonest edit summary. Ravensfire ( talk ) 04:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you Ravensfire. Looks like this is the second time today for him, so this account has only been used for vandalism. Add to this the name, which I believe is a reference to a sexual act, and the account as a whole is toxic. Dylan Flaherty (talk) 04:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Three things.

 * 1) Don't edit war. No, seriously.
 * 2) Libertarianism is conservative. We say "conservative/libertarian" because both terms are used, and because the latter modifies the former.
 * 3) I wasn't kidding about the edit-warring. Cut it out, already. Three people have independently reverted you, and that's just today. The dishonest edit comments haven't helped your case, either.

Dylan Flaherty (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Its apparent that the liberal leftists or very misguided individuals such as Dylan Flaherty and Raven.. are on a hell bent mission to ensure that voters are misinformed on the truth of the party they are researching. Not only is this scandalous and deceiving, but deserve punishment from an administrator of Wikipedia.


 * Passage taken directly from the official Libertarian Party website:
 * http://www.lp.org/faq
 * "Are Libertarians liberal or conservative?


 * Libertarians are neither. Unlike liberals or conservatives, Libertarians advocate a high degree of both personal and economic liberty"


 * "In a sense, Libertarians “borrow” from both sides to come up with a logical and consistent whole -- but without the exceptions and broken promises of Republican and Democratic politicians. That's why we call ourselves the Party of Principle."


 * Its crystal clear that conservatives and libertarians have no relation. Now we need to resolve weather the Tea Party is absolutely Libertarian. Please refresh your political facts before undermining the efforts of those who are educated in the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beachbum69 (talk • contribs) 04:51, November 1, 2010


 * Irrelevant. The TPm is neither conservative nor libertarian; all we can say is that it claims to be and is referred to as both. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Tea Party movement. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 04:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)