User talk:Beak99

Please refrain from vandalism as you have done to the Harrow School article. Thamizhan 19:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please refrain from vandalism again as you have done to the Harrow School article for the second time. Thamizhan 17:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Regardless of the date of posting, the talk page has clearly established Eton's fame and its status. The "spat" you refer to was an organized debate in which a clear consensus existed. By attempting to alter the result, you are youself POV in indicating that Eton is not what it is. If you continue, this will be construed as vandalism. Yanksta x 16:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Eton College are in violation of the consensus posted on the talk pages. It is not POV, and by editing otherwise you yourself are POV. As I warned before, if you continue, this will be construed as vandalism. Yanksta x 20:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked. A clear consensus was reached even after the mediation. If you continue to revert sourced, consensus material you will be blocked.

Yanksta x 17:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

No Consensus and what your are writing is clear POV - Beak99 2/26/2007#

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked. There is a clear consensus. What is there has been agreed upon and has numerous citations. If you do this again you will be blocked. Feel free to reopen the talk page discussion, but in inserting your POV you are committing vandalism. I suspect your prejudice has blinded you to the citations and the talk page consensus, but nevertheless, you are in violation of WP protocols. Cease immediately. Yanksta x 14:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

3RR on Eton College
Hallo- I'm afraid you have violated the 3RR on Eton College and I have had to report you. Sorry about this, it is the rules. Please see my recent comment on the Eton College talk page. All the best, Badgerpatrol 00:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I do not see any prior warning about the 3 revert rule, so I will not block you at this time. However, please read the page on the rule and do not violate it in the future or else you will be blocked. Thanks. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Lucius cornelius sulla 138 78 hi.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Lucius cornelius sulla 138 78 hi.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Lucius cornelius sulla 138 78 hi.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Lucius cornelius sulla 138 78 hi.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Beak99! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) David McCue -

Nomination of David McCue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David McCue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David McCue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)