User talk:BeamAlexander25/Archives 1

Invitation to RedWarn
Hello, BeamAlexander25! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 80 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767  talk!  13:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your reversion at Voivodeships--what you reverted wasn't vandalism
Hello. I follow things on Polish subjects. And I noticed that you reverted an edit at the article on the Voivodeships of Poland; you referred to the edit as vandalism; you also left a message for the IP User who did it, suggesting that s/he give a reason for his/her edits. In fact s/he did give a reason. S/he removed from the article a pair of tables of the Gross Regional Products of the individual Voivodeships, and explained that there already is a separate article. In fact, that's absolutely true, List of Polish voivodeships (provinces) by GRP, and it's been there for years. In fact, it seems that what the IP User removed and you put back is simply a copy of that other article. So whether it was advisable to remove it or not, the IP User did not "commit" vandalism. All that said, I do think it's advisable to remove it from the article on the Voivoideships. One could probably have a dozen different tables in that article, listing the Voivodeships according to a dozen different details--many of which might have their own articles. And these in particular are statistics that are bound to change over time. Have the same table in two places, and almost inevevitably someone will update one and not be aware of the other. Or, someone has to do the updating twice. I think that given the existence of the other article, it's best handled with a "See Also." Uporządnicki (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Since writing all that a few minutes ago, I noticed something more. That main article on the Voivodeships, in addition to that section (and well above it in placement), there is another section called "Economy of Voivodeships."  That section has a link to an article "List of Polish Voivodeships by GDP per capita."  And in fact, that links to the article I cited above about the Voivodeships by GRP (someone moved the article, explaining the correct terminology). Uporządnicki (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Skywalker family
Hello, are you a bot? You reverted my edits at Skywalker family, which was specifying that what the script said was that Palpatine said that he manipulated the midichlorians to allow for Anakin's conception, calling himself his father; how is that vandalism? 2001:BB6:52F1:AB00:5D66:CB57:F535:C81A (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)