User talk:Beanlynch

Fair use rationale for Image:Centurtyclub1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Centurtyclub1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

This image can be deleted. I will list the fair use rationale from the other image I am using.

Image copyright problem with Image:Crimemaster.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Crimemaster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm Afraid...
That work which you have made yourself is not eligible for use in an article about a Copyrighted character belonging to a Corporation; therefore, I have nominated both of your Green Goblins ketches for Speedy Deletion, as they are no longer used in any article and have no Fair Use Rationale. And may I also suggest polishing up your style before you submit your work on the Internet again; the Images you provided were badly-drawn sketches of a costume that has not been seen in previous continuity for two decades. SaliereTheFish 21:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

If there is a problem using my own artwork I do apologize. I am just learning the rules to this and I do not intend to violate any copyright laws. I would appreciate it if you could tone down your editorial criticisms a little. Obviously you have different tastes than I have. I don't find that Luke Ross image of the Goblin very appealing. It could be that I don't care for that style of art and it's fair to have different tastes. I prefer to Ditko style to the Goblin. While his costume might have been altered over the years, and no doubt will be altered many times in the future, this classic style is the template for the Green Goblin. While there are technical aspects of my drawings that might have various flaws I drew these the way I intended them to look according to what my tastes are.

Regardless of that issue, I'll make sure I understand the rules on putting images up before I make anymore alterations. -beanlynch

Glad to hear it, and sorry if I sounded a bit stern. My apologies. SaliereTheFish 10:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Green Goblin
Please read Template:SuperheroboxBrian Boru is awesome 18:24, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Centuryclub2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Centuryclub2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ams26.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ams26.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Outsiders 16 Cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Outsiders 16 Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Century Club


The article The Century Club has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Crime Master for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crime Master is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Crime Master until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Industrial Insect (talk) 01:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)