User talk:BearGlyph

2016 Kumamoto earthquake
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 2016 Kumamoto earthquake a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My apologies for the improper page moving procedure, I do hope this doesn't cause too much trouble. BearGlyph (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 *  Reply - Don't sweat it, be bold and learn from your mistakes. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Fisher reference
Hello Anthony- In that book you referenced, I don't see any mention of fishers or the rarity in mammals of the ability to descend head-first (and I think the author neglected to put "head-first" in the key sentence). I don't disagree with the ability being rare, but it would be better to give a ref that supports the assertion. Eric talk 13:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Eric, my interpretation of the author's statement that "some mammals" have evolved the ability to reverse the hind-claws is that the adaptation is only present in select mammals. For example, the American marten, a mustelid in the same genus as the Fisher, does not have this adaptation. The same claim with the same source, that descending a tree head-first by rotating the hind-claws is an uncommon ability, can be found within Eastern gray squirrel. Either both statements are supported by the source, or neither is supported by the source. I don't disagree that the wording in the source is perhaps too vague to solidly support the claim, but if the source doesn't work for this claim, the same within the eastern grey squirrel article should also be removed. I did find this source, which mentions that hind-claw reversal is related to descending a tree head-first. I will add it onto the phrase in question on both articles mentioned. However, this source does not explicitly mention the rarity of this adaptation either. I will do some more research. BearGlyph (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Anthony- Thanks for the info, and for looking into sources. Does Alexander say that it's the claws, or the whole foot, that can be rotated? Eric talk 16:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the unclear wording, it is the full hind foot which is rotated, not the claws themselves. The rotation of the foot facilitates the use of the claws in gripping the tree. This is mentioned in both Alexander's writing and the newly found source I mentioned earlier.BearGlyph (talk) 17:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, good. Just wanted to make sure I hadn't worded it wrong, as I'm no expert on varmint articulation. Thanks again. Eric talk 18:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Alaska at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Terry Fox and the Order of Canada
Hey! I saw your change, and while well meaning, I have reverted it. There are actually three postnominals for the Order of Canada, depending on what level a person reaches. "CM" for members, "OC" for officers, and "CC" for companions. As Fox was the latter, "CC" is proper in his case. Cheers! Resolute 22:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * My mistake, thank you for the explanation. BearGlyph (talk) 13:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 990s in art


The article 990s in art has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The only entry is incorrect. According to Fan Kuan, the artist was born c. 960, not 990.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

That tiny little table that goes in a pizza box on top of the pizza listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect That tiny little table that goes in a pizza box on top of the pizza. Since you had some involvement with the That tiny little table that goes in a pizza box on top of the pizza redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – MP Wiki Edits 20:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

"Skyput" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Skyput. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rulforth (talk) 07:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

"Shoob" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shoob&redirect=no Shoob] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)