User talk:Beardnomore

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Edison (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. S HEFFIELD S TEEL TALK 00:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Hi sheffield steel... the problem with the post on evolutionary theory of life is that it is written as a factual statement and niot as a theory, which is all that the theory of evolution is. there is no concrete evidence that the theory of evolution is fact, hence why it is still termed "theory". the article should reflect this. otherwise this article is a biased account and innaccuare and goes against wikipedia's unbiased articles policy
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style