User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateAugust2007

Pics from the Wiknic
Hi. Glad to see you got the pics. To put them on your User Page, you have to first upload them to Wikipedia on their own page. (This is the page that you go to whenever you click on a pic in an article.) I did this for you just now. You can see them by clicking and. I did not upload the one with me and Kat in it because I do not like posting pics of myself on the Net, and I do not know if Kat would want me to do so with her. To put the pics in an article or user page, just follow the instructions at Images. Just make sure you credit it to me by placing a wikilinked mention of me in the caption, okay? Thanks! Nightscream 15:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Any time, brother. :-) Nightscream 15:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Christianity Explored - request for advice.
Hi,

I noticed that Christianity Explored has been created and deleted twice - I think with two entirely separate articles - and I gather that the last to be deleted was a no-contest deletion as a spammy article with no assertion of notability. I haven't seen it of course, since it was deleted.

IMO Christianity Explored is notable and Wiki should have a good article about it ... but rather than leap in where Angels fear to tread (or fly?) I have created a personal sandbox page to draft something.

I would be grateful for your views - I am contacting all those who commented in the last deletion debate, as you will have seen the previous article.

The article is at []

Regards

Simon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Springnuts (talk • contribs).

Hunting license
So what would you like me to take a stab at? I'm not a hunter, so I don't have any particular expertise, and I'm better at finding old news stories, but hey, maybe I'll learn something. - Crockspot 22:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Joe Stenard
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Joe Stenard, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Joe Stenard seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Joe Stenard, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Tom Smith
Thanks, but it was Shsilver who did the heavy lifting. I wouldn't have known to cite that Oxford U Press book...--SarekOfVulcan 18:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Shsilver 19:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Joe Stenard
I have restored the article to your userspace here so that you may continue to edit it. Carlossuarez46 22:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Ted Frank
Heya! I noticed you a fair bit on WP:LAW and was wondering if you could help me out. Ted Frank is notable for writing on law in the US, but there's not a lot of that in the article. It's kinda difficult for me to write about his views on class action and tort reform because I don't much understand what either of those are or what's significant to mention in the article. :) Can I ask that you look him up and decipher it for the common reader? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, that would be great. Btw, looked in your sandbox - would you be interested in joining WP:LGBT? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Poke. Teddy's waiting... :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair use images of living people aren't allowed on Wikipedia just to show what they look like. Btw, what you mind sifting through his legal opinions and writing up the recorded viewpoints section? It really could do with a lawyer. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

RFA revisited
Hi Bearian, I remembered the RFA nomination that I offered you, so I decided to create a user subpage with the text of my nomination for whenever you decide to accept it. If you copy it into the RFA, you should state in your edit summary that you copied it with my permission. I am not putting pressure on you to try RFA at a particular time: do it whenever you are ready. The nomination statement is here: User:Shalom/Drafts and archives/Nomination for Bearian. Best regards, Shalom Hello 22:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)