User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMar2014

Treason Act 1554
Since More died in 1535, the act of 1554 seemed unlikely to be relevant to him, or to have been mentioned in the film. Perhaps you meant another act? Richard75 (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry for the conflation. Bearian (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jinx Falkenburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

since you are giving barnstars
Since you are giving barnstars, read this. I find this uncivil. You think so ? That is allowed ? 172.243.183.183 (talk) 09:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * This IP editor has been advised by more than one editor to drop the stick, and I have now advised him/her to read WP:FORUMSHOP. He or she is heading for a long block if he or she continues much longer. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

sleeping with the enemy
A non-notable book is non-controversial.

That the non-notable book happens to be about something potentially "controversial" does not make the book itself "controversial". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * O.K. ... but when the P.C. comrades come after you, don't blame me! Bearian (talk) 20:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

NYC April Meetup
Actually, the plan is for a weekend meetup (Saturday or Sunday), not a weekday :)--Pharos (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks! Bearian (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Roar (song)...whimper?
Thanks for your message Bearian, but I have no recollection of this. A long day and possibly a touch of senility setting in. Could you set my mind at rest and give me a clue as to what I did and when. Can't see anything in page history that looks like me. Ready to apologise now if it was stupid or a bad call. I am not known as a pop picker on Wiki so quite suprised if I did review, but anything possible! (Katy Perry...who he?) Libby norman (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Fine, and good save by you. Sorry for my hopelessness. Libby norman (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600355483 your edit] to Jepoy Almario may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * { Prod2|Not a lot of  WP:RS|good sources on Google.}

Shadow Man
Looks borderline to me, but the Times of India source may put it over the edge. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Adrian Newman (producer)
In January you PRODded this (actually, you PROD2-ed it, but the PRODder was an IP with no other edits), and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks for the courtesy! Bearian (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks


C 1776 M Talk has given you a glass of orange juice! OJ promotes WikiLove and hopefully this glass has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a glass of orange juice, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just someone who looks thirsty. Happy drinking!

Thanks for doing the thankless job of an Admin.

Spread the orange-ness by adding WikiOJ to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Fred Phelps
Hi Bearian there was a request at WP:RFPP to add back the indef semi on I was intending to add it back until I saw that you'd removed it because it's no longer a BLP. I've semi'd the page for a couple days due to current vandalism and abuse, would you consider adding back the indef semi or at least a semi for a year or two to see if it's calmed down by then? Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * , I don't think it is required any more; a few days are plenty in this case. Feel free to extend it a few days or weeks w/o further notice. Indef semi-protection should be used by admins very rarely on non-BLP articles:

"Administrators may apply indefinite semi-protection to pages that are subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content policy (such as biographies of living persons, neutral point of view). Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred, nor should it be used to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes. (emphasis added)"

- Page_protection

Bearian (talk) 16:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The page is subject to heavy and persistent vandalism, as evidenced by the amount of vandalism which started on the page almost straight after you removed the indef semi. If it starts up again after the two days I'm thinking it's worth going straight to a month or two of semi-protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demography of Peja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 22:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

BTW, for the cheeseburger! --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 23:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback: Puerto Rico National Guard Museum
&mdash;Ahnoneemoos (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Help on an article or two
Hey, I see you Be of the legal persuasion. I have been looking for help with an article that concerns business law regarding my particular niche, Burger King. They regard some issues with Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in regards to three related cases of franchise relations. Since I'm not a lawyer, I have no idea how to proceed.

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

What little I have is here.

--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 23:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
— This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)