User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOctNovDec2009

Request
Please block User:72.94.93.157. They are repeatedly posting false info to List of DirecTV channels after being warned to stop. I think its the same person as the last IP I had you block for doing the same thing. Thanks. TomCat4680 (talk) 18:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)



TomCat4680 (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk puj with friendly messuj to all.

Wikis Take Manhattan
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Accusation of personal attacks
You accused me of making personal attacks in the article I wrote, Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America. Please be advised that you are mistaken, I'm not sure why. I made no personal attacks. Everything I wrote came from news reports from reputable news sources, such as the ABC TV network and the largest newspaper in Boston. David spector (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your "Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America" deletion
Mr. Bearian, he called HIMSELF a financial terrorist. I was quoting him. Read the references. David spector (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Bearian, you apparently only read one of the three references. Jenifer McKim's article in the Boston Globe starts as follows:


 * Bruce Marks, chief executive of the Jamaica Plain-based Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America and self-proclaimed “bank terrorist’’...

Mr. Bearian, that sounds like a quotation from Mr. Marks to me. That's what "self-proclaimed" means, coming from a reporter.

If you have any remaining doubt, Mr. Marks then says, "Bank terrorism is a nonviolent way we personalize the consequences of CEOs’ actions." (Remember, this is an interview. You don't use quotation marks in an interview article.)

Another quotation directly from Bruce Marks from the same interview:


 * You have to engage in bank terrorism. It gets their attention.

The ABC Nightline report on TV includes the following:


 * BRUCE MARKS (NEIGHBORHOOD ASSISTANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA): We wear nonviolent bank terrorism as a badge of honor.

Mr. Bearian, I am waiting for your apology and restoration of the article and its talk page. And please be more careful in the future. David spector (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I can read, but I am not sure that you can. It is clear that "bank terrorism" and "financial terrorism" are not the same thing.  Please take your complaint to deletion review. Bearian (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

David Standish Ball
I was surprised to see this article, not having thought of Fr. Ball since he was actually Canon Ball (yeah, we got a lotta yardage out of that as kids at summer camp).

I was more taken back though, by the characterization of St Peter's as "an urban parish in a downtown neighborhood, that entailed what was called slum work". There are no cites for this, and from my memory, St Peter's neighborhood was never a slum. It was downtown, but not near the slums in Albany. I was not a member of the parish, but of another Episcopal church in town. Since there are no citations for this comment, I will delete it, but will not take offense if you restore it if you have additional knowledge. Riverpa (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
You forgot to put a message in it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * My bad, done now. Bearian (talk) 21:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Abecedare (talk) 17:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Naples Grape Festival
No article??? Have a good weekend. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:40, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Bitey?
I won't argue too strongly with "per DGG". Those bother me because they are effectively a vote against allowing exclusionist admins, but I cannot deny that I am an exclusionist. "Bitey" I will question. WP:BITE is an essay against being snappy to newcomers. If you can find cases of me being bitey, I'd appreciate having them pointed out. Most newcomers that I interact with seem to come away with a positive opinion of me, and I am frequently dealing with their requests for help. I'm pretty stern with User:Wiki-11233 and User:Petergriffin9901, but since I'm responsible for having gotten their indefinite blocks lifted and mentoring them during a probationary period, I think it's necessary to be firm with them. If you are referring to Meursault2004, I can accept criticism for having been harsh. As I documented in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3, I came to the conclusion that his problematic edits were performed with the full knowledge that his edits were problematic and that the previous editor to perform them was indefinitely blocked as a result. Reasonable people can disagree with my conclusion, but his first edit here was Feb 4, 2004, and has accumulated 2,984 edits. He's a bureaucrat and administrator on other Wikiprojects. This is hardly a newbie, and that factored into my conclusion that his violation was performed knowingly, not innocently.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * He's not trying to convince you, per se. He's just (as far as I can tell) looking for an example of the behavior you mentioned in your oppose.  At the very least, if this RfA fails, it will allow him to gain some specific feedback. Protonk (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * FWIW, I have frequently voted for admin candidates whom i though exclusionist, though some of them have since changed their mind slightly on that question.  And I'm exclusions myself about many local topics -- and, fort that matter, non-fiction books, and internet memes with BLP problems. For those last, I've often been in the !delete minority. Berian, I realize you understand this--I put it here for anyone dropping by. KWW, I hope that you will understand this too, next time around.    DGG ( talk ) 23:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Category question
Could you weigh in on this? The article was moved from being about the person to being about the murder and case. Intuitively I think the categories should stay for those looking for articles on these subjects but I may be misreading our standards. -- Banj e b oi   15:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

RFA spam
Re-entered by me.

Proposed Deletion of Ashford.com
This entry was vetted yesterday by another Admin the outcome of which was his satisfaction (please see my talk entries). I have re-read the guidelines and reviewed the copy again to ensure it is not promotional and am confused as to why it is still being proposed for deletion? If it is a matter of adding more historical links per Joe Chill ,, , , , and. I am happy to oblige, clearly the company has significance as it has been studied in books of logo design and several other business books. I just need a little more clarity, if you visit the links above you will see there is notability and the content is not written in a promotional manner.

Seyoda (talk) 23:47, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Dude
It wasn't a test, dude. I was just adding information that I thought was true. Although I hadn't read WP:VERIFY then... --The does (talk) 09:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Asfhord.com removal
Hi Bearian,

Thanks for the feedback, sorry to negatively affect your formatting. I have added some of the content cited by Joe Chill around accounting abnormalities and ensuing fines. I feel that given a 12 year history and Ashford's overall marketplace news / interactions over that time meet WP:NOTE and WP:NPOV requirements.

Seyoda (talk) 14:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Withdrawal of nomination
Well for a CfD, generally you just need to close the discussion using the templates and remove the nomination tag from the category page. Do you need more detail? Vegaswikian (talk) 21:53, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The templates are here. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Recall
Your user page states you are open to recall. What is the procedure you use? Thanks! Hipocrite (talk) 14:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The process for recall is described at Administrators open to recall/Sample process. I am generally ready for a recall, however, due to personal reasons right now (i.e., a fire in my apartment building on October 12, 2009), I am not ready to participate in another RfA.  In past practice, recall can only be intiated by the admin.  What prompted this inquiry?  Do you have a particular concern that I may be able to address?  Do you want me to initiate a recall for myself? Bearian (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. I probably should develop my own process. Bearian (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * See also Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria and User:Bearian/Standards. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I've did the A admins yesterday, and the B admins today. Just a survey to make sure all the i's are crossed and the t's dotted. I have no concerns (or knowledge, honestly) of you or your admin actions or whatever. Sorry about the fire. Keep rocking! Hipocrite (talk) 18:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How disappointing. I was looking forward to some excitement! :) Sorry to hear about the fire Bearian. I hope all is well. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Prod2
May I point your attention to the documentation of Template:Prod2. It say very clearly Debresser (talk) 10:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Michele Weiner Davis
Hi I am a new editor at Wikipedia and my first project that I’ve taken on by accident it turned out to be is the contested deletion of the article Biography of Michele Weiner Davis that you had voted on back in September of last month. I had spoken to the editor Karanacs shortly after the article was recently deleted a second time because when I first contested the deletion when I came across her name in red letters in Wikipedia during my first week here as an user, another editor came along and just completed her Bio for me (See Graeme Bartlett (talk)  remarks on my user talk page) but the article still failed to meet the standards for inclusion. I asked Karanacs if I could try and attempt to gather the needed references to try and make this right for inclusion and she said I could give it a go. Please take a look at the references I have put together for Michele W.D. to see if the article might be able to meet the inclusion standards now. I have omitted any personal information I have collected thus far until I see if this will be a go or not. Thank You for your time John Francis. Tinkermen (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Al najah secondary school
Hi, Bearian. I have rewritten Al-Najah Secondary School. Would you revisit Articles for deletion/Al najah secondary school? My suggestion is to keep the current article and purge the page history which contains attacks on the school's principal. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

School for Children, Eatontown, New Jersey
Obrigado, it feels better to keep one but there was so little there it seemed hopeless.--Jessica Gordon (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Bose Products Merge
Thanks for your input into the AfD for Bose stereo speakers et. al. As you may have seen, the result was No Consensus. I have started a discussion to find consensus on merging all of these articles together. Feel free to contribute your opinions here. Thanks! talk 23:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Huh?
I was not even aware that I had been blocked. I'm glad whatever happened was straightened out. I'm sure in hindsight it must be hilarious, though yes I can imagine I wouldve been quite upset had I come on and found out I was blocked! Thank you for figuring out the mistake.Camelbinky (talk) 04:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bose wave systems
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bose wave systems, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Rewrite FPAF page?
 14:11, 3 November 2009 Bearian (talk | contribs) deleted "Foundation for the Preservation of the American Family (FPAF)" ‎ (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion: G11: Unambiguousadvertising or promotion) 

Hi Bearian, I got the notice for speedy deletion (above), and the page was deleted before I got a chance to explain. Just want to let you know beforehand that I will try to rewrite it with a neutral POV, so I hope you won't put a flag on that page. The purpose of creating the page for the foundation (non-profit) is just providing a general description what we do, and what kind of projects we are currently doing, so that people who (accidentally or intentionally) of trying to find out more about us in wikipedia can get the detailed information. It's not to advertise ourselves.

I'm aware we are lacking on the sources still, so that's why I'm going for the neutral POV. Any advice or suggestion would be greatly appreciated, as at least I am still new to being involved in wikipedia. Thanks! Freehelplist (talk) 07:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Syriajob.com
Hello dear,

an article about wwww.job.sy by syriajob user was deleted although it was in the draft ,,

i dont know what made it a marketing article ..would you please feed me back ..

thanks

Syriajob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Syriajob (talk • contribs) 15:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Foreign titles of nobility in Malta
Hi. I revised the article as per your suggestions. Please see if you like it. Thank you Mobile historian (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Royalty_and_Nobility.   RGTraynor  16:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Minnesota Statutes
Doc Quintana (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Doc Quintana (talk) 14:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Aharon Razin
On 5 November, you added the opening banner "This article needs additional citations for verification." to Aharon Razin. Whilst I agree that the article is very short and needs expanding (and is accordingly marked as a stub), there are clear citations for each fact stated in the article. Accordingly, I do not believe that wording of the banner applicable to this article. Davshul (talk) 07:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

RE:New York Consolidated Laws
You recently left a message on my talk page. I am a little confused. What do you exactly want to do and how should I help? Do you want to create two seperate articles and remove the redirect or just imporve the article? Thanks The  Wo  rld  19:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Out of policy blocking
Your warning on my Talk-Page looks to be wholly outside policy. Would you care to remove it? IP86.158.184.158 (talk) 20:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Energy law
Let me quote the article introduction :

''Energy laws govern the use and taxation of energy, both renewable and non-renewable. These laws are the primary authorities (such as caselaw, statutes, rules, regulations and edicts) related to energy. In contrast, energy policy refers to the policy and politics of energy.''

So it has been made clear (by original editors) that whatever relates to policy(ies) has no business here. So I deleted the line again. If you think the article should include policy-related information, you may change the scope of the article.--Environnement2100 (talk) 23:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I do get your point. But if you never clear up articles, whose definition makes them impossible to maintain, created by people who never come back, you end up with a large number of pages not at all looking like an encyclopedia. Best regards. --Environnement2100 (talk) 23:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me
But may you tell me somethings about wikipedia thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biloford (talk • contribs) 19:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
you are very kind —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biloford (talk • contribs) 19:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This edit summary.....
..... made me laugh and cheered me up on a miserable, cold, misty November morning. Thank you. Nancy talk  07:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

1970 ascariasis poisoning incident

 * Thanks for the message. It was notable in the respect it was an unprecedented infection and was cited the New York Times, Chicago Sun Times or Tribune, and in a bioterrorism paper (which I failed to add).  I can add those if it helps.  However if you and others think it's questionable and it warrants a speedy delete, I totally respect that.  I am replying on your page too as I don't understand Wikipedia messaging protocols very well and am not sure that you are monitoring my own talk space for changes. -Rolypolyman (talk) 20:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

ACD
See Naming conventions (capitalization). Neutralitytalk 21:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Remco group
I didn't create this article.... in fact I replaced a speedy delete tag on it. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 22:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
CalumH93 (talk) 23:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
CalumH93 (talk) 07:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Parishcruft
We don't need to be the repository for lists of all locations of even a notable organization, be it McDonald's (fastfoodcruft), the Post Office (mailcruft), or some religious denomination (parishcruft). :-) Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of St. Andrew's Episcopal Church (Des Moines, Iowa)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is St. Andrew's Episcopal Church (Des Moines, Iowa). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/St. Andrew's Episcopal Church (Des Moines, Iowa). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use photos
You know, I'm not sure. My first instinct was to say that Fair Use applies to things like movie posters and magazine covers/logos, but then I started thinking, wait, does Fair Use only apply to companies and not privately-owned images? It never occurred to me until now, and I'm definitely not an expert on Fair Use. I never even bother adding images to articles unless they're images on the Commons (usually the ones I create myself). I would suggest that you consult Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. I also started a discussion on this question here, because I'd like to know myself. Nightscream (talk) 02:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, there's also this page. Nightscream (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Lucky Man (Emerson, Lake & Palmer song)
Hi, I just wanted to drop you a line to thank you for the Article Rescue Barnstar. It's much appreciated! Regards,  Gongshow  Talk 04:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I do ...
I have a user page and have for a long time. It's not much, but there it is. Kace7 (talk) 15:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC) (Delete this later if you like.)

AfD nomination of Denmark – New Zealand relations
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Denmark – New Zealand relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Denmark – New Zealand relations (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Deep Blue
Thanks for the comment. Joe Chill (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Brayden Pierce inquiry and concern
Hi Brian,

I hope you are well! I noticed how much you do for Wikipedia and it's quite appreciated on my end. I do marketing for Brayden Pierce. He is a talent that is noteworthy, due to his appearances and recurrings on popular syndicated TV Shows and films that are listed on Wikipedia already, and can be verified by the legitimate, www.IMDB.com. He currently recurs on a popular TV show on The CW, Melrose Place, where over a million viewers tune in weekly for new episodes. He just finished another episode last week. In reference to the super bowl commercial, it can be publicly viewed on you tube at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJn6WVOZaqQ. As far as Brayden and music, Brayden plays live frequently, and a myspace page connecting Brayden to Zerowave is viewable at www.myspace.com/zerowaveband. When googling Brayden Pierce, you can see that most pages out of hundreds are in regards to this respective talent. In terms of everything listed on the Wikipedia page, it is factual, and I will be happy to work with you in the spirit of Truth through any concerns you may have now, and in the future. Thank you for keeping Wikipedia a trusted source.

Best, Scotthardentv (talk) 10:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Scott

World Series Cricket Results
I came across this article and I'm not sure what to do with it. The title is rather vague and I'm wondering if this should be merged. But should it? And to what article? Or just prodded or AFD'd? Totally confused. - Warthog Demon  04:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) - Warthog Demon  04:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Ove Michaelsen
Under the correct title of the Wiki page, "O.V. Michaelsen," search results will be more extensive. Although O.V. has been cited as "Ove Michaelsen," because of a fictional Ove Michaelsen online, the correct spelling should clear things up.

Please see the references on the page.

It would be a tragedy to discredit a life's work with legitimate sources by glancing over a misspelled name and nominate the author's name for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.74.160 (talk) 06:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

O.V. Michaelsen page
Hello Bearian, I put up the page, my first, and made the mistake of using Ove instead of O.V. but can assure you they are the same person on internet searches. His friends call him Ove and I stupidly used that in the title. Thanks for correcting my mistake. In reference to Mr. Michaelsen I'd like to mention that it's a unique and small group of enthusiasts that enjoy the 'wordplay' he does and it doesn't have the sort of mass appeal of other kinds of writing. Still, I believe it would be a shame to have one less reference to this sort of intellectual fun on Wikipedia. There is a page for wordplay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_play but it is very broad in it's interpretation of the subject and O.V.'s (Ove to his friends) incredible palindromes, etc. aren't the kind of mass market stuff that gets much attention. I think it would be a shame to lose this clever work when 'pop' culture is becoming the ONLY culture left. If I remove the musician part (he's always been an itinerant musician and songwriter without notable success) would that help? Thanks for your work at Wikipedia and let me know if there is something I can do to keep the page up. John Kevin Loesch ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Celetus (talk • contribs) 20:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam


Terry Buck
Could you please be so kind as to explain why no stub article was produced after:


 * 2009-12-09T08:56:36 Bearian (talk | contribs) deleted "Terry Buck" ‎ (G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP: G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP)

I can see how much of what I wrote would come across negative but it had more sources than content sentences and the sources included Australia's largest news outlets, so it was not unsourced. I thought BLP applied to Biographies of Living Persons but I also clearly sourced that the gentleman had been deceased for some years, so it was not BLP. I also put in the effort to explain with a positive source that he was an Olympic athlete, coach, and manager whose efforts paid off in Olympic gold medals and as such satisfied WP:Notability. Having eliminated negative unsourced BLP I must assume that it appeared to constitute an WP:Attack page. Now according to WP:ATP,


 * If the subject of the article is notable, but the existing page consists primarily of attacks against the subject of the article, and there's no good revision to revert to, then the attack page should be deleted and an appropriate stub article should be written in its place. This is especially important if the page contains biographical material about a living person.

I thought this would somehow obligate you as the deleter to produce an appropriate WP:Stub. Please tell me if I should expect you to do this over the next day.

Warmest Regards, :)-- thecurran Let it off your chest the past 09:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I tagged the article for speedy deletion, and since TheCurran asked me to respond: Although I don't remember the article perfectly, when I see an article that appears to have been created chiefly to point out that someone stands accused of child abuse I'll probably flag it pretty quickly.  Googling around a bit, I see that (1) Terry Buck actually existed, (2) he's truly dead, and (3) there have indeed been some "explosive allegations" of child abuse.  I doubt that's enough to sustain the article, but others may take a different view and I believe you that you created the article in good faith.  --Glenfarclas (talk) 09:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response. Even without the allegations, I think he satisfies basic WP:Notability criteria. I think I only added one reference without the allegations so here are a couple more:


 * http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/bu/terry-buck-1.html


 * http://corporate.olympics.com.au/athlete/839/Terry+Buck

Warmest Regards, :)-- thecurran Let it off your chest the past 14:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You have to ask to receive. I don't do such things automatically, as I am a very busy person in real life, and that is not normal pratice on WP.  I'll consider your request and get back to you within the week.  You can also go to WP:DRV.  Bearian (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response. I do not mean to comport myself as domineering. Warmest Regards, :)-- thecurran Let it off your chest the past 23:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA Thanks
MrKIA11 (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

"Young American Virtuosi"
I'm have a hard time finding them in that NYT source you added to the article -- could you review that, please? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ooops - either trivial mention or false friend. Bearian (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, thought I was being dense or something. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nursing in pakistan
Nope, not kidding at all. Perhaps a user so concerned about the way an article is nominated for deletion should examine the way he responds to the nominator as well; your message was downright rude in the way it was delivered. Ironholds (talk) 00:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays and Happy Birthday!

 * And a brilliant Birthday to you too! PS: Lol'd at the lolcats. :) — what a crazy random happenstance 17:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The Great Wikipedia Dramaout
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Terry Buck
Hi, you deleted an article by that title on the 9th of this month. I've been having a conversation with an IP editor I know and he's come up with a nice collection of information for the article (enough to establish notability and write neutrally). Thus, unless you have any objections, I'll probably recreate the article on his behalf at some point in the not too distant future. Just a courtesy to let you know! All the best, HJMitchell    You rang?   16:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

And another, HJMitchell    You rang?   17:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Naples Grape Festival
I created a stub for the Naples Grape Festival. You may want to expand it. - Eastmain (talk) 04:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at WikiProject Administrator. Jusdafax(talk) 00:52, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays


❄  upstate NYer  ❄ is wishing you a happy Capital District holiday! Wikiproject Capital District is coming up on one year of successful work. I'd like to thank you for the help and support, and effort to expand the scope of New York's Capital District on Wikipedia. Enjoy your respective holiday and best wishes for the coming new year (especially related to your content work on Wikipedia)!

Thank you
Thanks very much for the barnstar for my work on the article Amy Pond. Much appreciated, Cirt (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion - Siemon band
Sir, I thank you for the opportunity NOT to exercise the opportunity to re-write the 'offending entry' Considering the notification to delete and the opportunity were exercised during Christmas New Year period. Accordingly, under the Wikipedia rules you enforce so 'rapidly' Zippomk2 (talk) 07:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

== Sadly Brian my 'working knowledge of the law' and my sister as a Principal Lawyer here in Australia doesn't mean you me or anyone here will be sued. I know the band! The issues I have are long standing with 'kneejerk' speedy deletion policy! This band wouldn't sue, you are a lawyer and I understand you are jumpy, as you say ask and you will receive....you didn't ask either Brian. The page was up for several months without that issue arising. Sadly am over wiki period, thank you for your reply but too late! Wiki is becoming a nightmare for people like me with a basic knowledge of the protocols and finer points. I get that rot at work, Wiki was a creative outlet not a legalistic and procedural jungle with pitfalls around every turn. What I say still goes! Zippomk2 (talk) 11:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Chidren's Christmas Parade merge to Children's Christmas Parade
I see you deleted Children's Christmas Parade, which is necessary in order to merge histories. However, Chidren's Christmas Parade still needs to be moved to that title, and the original article at Children's Christmas Parade needs to then be undeleted by an admin to complete the merge. Thanks. –radiojon (talk) 07:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy decine Mexican Earthquake
Okay thanks for letting me know. However, it just seemed to me insignificant to have its own page. --Stevedietrich (talk) 19:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for letting me know! Regards, --Stevedietrich (talk) 19:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

2009 Mexicali earthquake
Thanks! Greetings from Bucharest, Romania. TouLouse (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Romanesci is not a hoax - it was also talked about in other wikipedia articles - similar to Aromanian...but distinct
Hello. I can assure you that Romanesci is a real language and is one of the closest cousins of pre-classical Latin. My undergrad in the Classics (Greek and Roman History and Literature) as well as 25 years of studying the link to Roman history/language and Romanesci qualify me as an authority on this topic. A paper was written and submitted in 1993 to Professor Andrew Adams at North Central College (Naperville) on the similarities between Romanesci and Latin. It is also very simliar to Aromanian but different and more authentically related to Latin in many distinct ways. I would be happy to provide more examples and links but I am new to wikipedia and I had a really tough time creating links. Sorry for any confusion or trouble caused. As the Romanae dit Grecu say - Sanitate (to your health). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchino (talk • contribs) 19:54, 31 December 2009 (UTC)