User talk:Beatley/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roselidah Obunaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your translations
Hi, Beatley. I see that you have created some new articles by translating from Wikipedia articles in, , , , and. That's great, I do some of that as well. This is just a reminder that translations from other Wikipedias are governed by the translation guideline, and by policies about providing attribution.

Right now, I'm working on one article you created a while back which was translated from German. The English article has a lot of gobbledygook in parts, and was obviously translated by a software program like Google Translate. Copyediting done since then by you and others has fixed up the beginning portion of the article, so at least half of it reads like proper English now, but much of it remains completely inscrutable. I'm not sure what happened here, were you in a hurry to move on to something else? Please be aware that the policy on machine translation says that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing. And it's not enough just to copyedit the result, you have to refer back to the original article to make sure that Google translate didn't screw up not only the wording, but also the facts, and you have to be able to understand the original language in order to do that. I'll have a look at the German article in this case and retranslate the sections of it that need it. I can handle that and don't need help. I'd just like to request that you avoid using machine translation and that going forward, you stick to languages you understand well enough to produce accurate translations from.

Also, please remember that translations from one Wikipedia to another require attribution in the edit summary; you can also use the translated page template for this on the Talk page once the translation is complete. In addition, it can be helpful to add the appropriate Translation template to the top of the article page. I would suggest one of these: Rough translation, Cleanup translation, or Proofreader needed. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 09:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Anne Andrieux
 * added a link pointing to 2001 European Championships


 * Martel Schwichtenberg
 * added a link pointing to November group

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. --Dashy Games  (contribs) 15:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Please update categories
Hello, I see that you've recently moved several draft articles from the Czech volleyball player's biographies to their mainspaces, that I've marked as patrolled; however, the categories need to be cleaned up as all articles have categories with a colon at the beginning, which is restricting them to assume their rightful position. Could you please look into the same and have them rectified? Thanks. TopCipher (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabriela Zazueta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2015 Universiade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

SvG drafts
Above, you claim that you verify Sander v Ginkel drafts before you moved them. I just had to move Draft:Amina Fouad back though, as it clearly wasn't checked. I hope this was a one-off error and not an indication that you don't check these drafts thoroughly enough? Fram (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * thank you for the error report. i've added a better reference. as a sign of good faith why don't you move it back to article space? i see you are following my edits closely, it that just the one?
 * i see you are moving other articles to drafts, where the references are correct; are you sure you want to do that? Beatley (talk) 16:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm not "following your edits closely", I'm checking on some SvG drafts from time to time (though less than I used to, as it os too depressing). I move articles to draft individually when they have clear problems not solved by the ones moving them back to mainspace. I move articles back to draft en masse when an editor makes too many mistakes in his moves to mainspace only. In those cases, I move them all back, the good with the bad, as they can't be trusted and haven't been checked thoroughly.


 * Looking at your recent moves, you should activate the categories again, and I don't get why Roxana Iosef is at that name instead of at Roxana Bacsis, which isn't even a redirect. At Ioana Baciu, only her year of birth is sourced, not her date of birth (which has been wrong on too many SvG articles). Insuch a case, you should either source the full date or remove eveything but the year. But in general the articles you move seem to be in better shape than many other groups of SvG articles. Fram (talk) 08:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


 * As for moving that draft back to mainspace: you have added a good source that a player with that name played at the 2002 championships. The source has no information about her otherwise, so 90% of the article is still unsourced. Todor66 is, as far as I can tell, not a reliable source but an expansive one-man hobby site with probably lots of correct information, but also incorrect information. In this case, it doesn't even mention Amina Fouad, so leaving it in the article is wrong on many levels. So no, that page is not ready at all to be moved back to mainspace, and that you believe it is after it has already been moved back as problematic is worrying. Fram (talk) 08:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Just from yesterday: Muna Muneer has the club unsourced (I removed it); that she retired is not sourced. I have seen a dozen of other pages having the same problems, for example Umeda Juraeva. If you continue I will unfortunately have to take you to ANI. This is not what the whole SvG exercies was about. I do not even mention the fact that the players of the Maldives team are likely not notable since they never played in the highest competition in their sport (per WP:NSPORT) and never received enough attention to pass WP:GNG. To avoid misunderstanding, I found these articles in the unreviewed queue.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

SvG drafts (again)
Beatley, either drastically improve your checks and corrections of the Svg drafts, or stop moving them to the mainspace. Too many still have fundamental problems, explaianed to you already in the past but not improved since. The articles need a reliable source for the information (Todor66 is not a reliable source), and everything in it that is not sourced should be removed (e.g. the claim that a player is "retired" when this is often unknown or even contradicted by the remainder of the article; or the list of clubs). Please alo only move articles back about sujects which are clearly notable. Participating in the Asian Games is not sufficient to be considered notable, for many of the contestants it seems to be very hard to find actual indepth coverage about them.

I am close to simply moving all your SvG cleanups back to the draftspace, as spotchecks reveal too many problems. See also the above post by Ymblanter, and comments by Alsee. Fram (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)


 * i will follow policy. i will retain uncontroversial unsourced statements. you delete these articles, and i will take them to AfD, and we will see if you have a consensus. Beatley (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Here you are: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * hey, that's great. let's see if you have a consensus for your statements right now. what is the consensus about the reliability of Todor66 ? what fundamental problems ? i see notable athletes with at least one source. Beatley (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

You're not helping - all you're doing is creating more work for other editors. You could at least submit the drafts to Articles for Creation for review, because currently all you're doing is churning out awful articles to prove some kind of point. The point of a collaborative project is to work with others - the point is not to create unnecessary pointless "busy work" for my fellow New Page Reviewers. Please abide by the spirit of the AN/I discussion that caused these awful, low quality, machine-created articles to be moved to Draft space in the first place, because you're currently a net negative to Wikipedia. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * i think it is crystal clear, who is helping and who is not. i win awards for collaboration, what would you know of it? Beatley (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, let's see - which one of us is currently at AN/I because of the huge mess they're in the process of creating? Please try to work with everyone else here - this isn't some sort of private mission of yours. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * i see a lot of statements made without evidence, or links to consensus, or policy. is ANI your idea of collaboration? Beatley (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Could you please at least stop moving SvG drafts to mainspace while the discussion at ANI plays out and we see what consensus is on this? GoldenRing (talk) 19:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of indef for disruptove editing and/or WP:CIR--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * I blocked you indef; after the ANI discussion has been finished, we decide how and on which conditions you can be unblocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * fine, you realize that the artificial deadline is not my doing. will you suspend moving articles to draft or deleting drafts until there is a broad consensus? is this block different from the April fools one above?  Beatley (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , there was a discussion that went on for months, ending in a vote at AN/I that created the deadlines - so there already is a broad, community-based consensus about these poorly sourced, automatically-created articles. You're going against that consensus for no apparent reason. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * (ec) Well, you can post an unblock request and see whether it is different or not. I am afraid the most likely outcome of the discussion would be moving all articles you touched back to draft - presumably something opposite to what you want to achieve.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * For completeness, and because it took me a few minutes to find it, the consensus for how to deal with these drafts is here. The section titled 'Types of problem' should be read carefully.  GoldenRing (talk) 19:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * "Yes, indeed, I blocked them indef since they continued to move such articles into the main space en masse, they will be unblocked after" - why don't you change the duration of the block now, if that was really your intent?
 * "there was a discussion that went on for months, ending in a vote at AN/I that created the deadlines" - this discussion did not end in a revised BLP or NATHLETE policy, or even RfC, reflecting the lack of a broad consensus. will you now block editors for not following your "out of policy" demands?
 * "I am afraid the most likely outcome of the discussion would be moving all articles you touched back to draft" - you are intent on the mass move and then mass deletion of the articles, regardless of any edits i might happen to make, good, bad, or indifferent. blocking me was a necessary pre-condition for that mass deletion. and mischaracterizing those edits was necessary as well. the vindictive mass deletion of other people's work is a losing tactic on a "collaborative" website, but it will affect your reputation. Beatley (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I am waiting for the conclusion of the ANI discussion. I was about to ask for closure early today, but someone commented yesterday night, so we have to wait again. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Unblocked, though the discussion still needs to be formally closed.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

About the Sander v. Ginkel drafts
Pursuant to this ANI discussion, you are now banned from moving any of the drafts affected by that cleanup to articlespace. As per WP:UNBAN you can appeal the ban on the WP:AN board. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Michèle Audette for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michèle Audette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michèle Audette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Dana Cranston) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dana Cranston, Beatley!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"In the future, please add detail to your references instead of just including links."

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Dalina Bocour) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dalina Bocour, Beatley!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"In the future, do not include a colon before Categories. Use  instead of"

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Danica Uljević for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danica Uljević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danica Uljević until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * I guess it was a bad idea to unblock you, since you continue doing exactly the same for what you have been blocked before. At least npw your unblock request will be reviewed by another administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * you need to apologize for your bad block. apparently the articles nominated for deletion were kept as "no consensus" you do not have a consensus for the actions you are taking. blocking editors so you can delete articles, by force, only works if you have a consensus. you are so incompetent, i will make an example out of you. Beatley (talk) 20:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, go ahead and make an example.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * just keep the block on indefinitely, since you cannot win an argument by authority alone. Beatley (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not going to win anything. Just post an unblock request and see whether the reviewing administrator finds your argumentation convincing. In particular, the argumentation will have to show your understanding of Wikipedia policies.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * no, i have no confidence whatever in a fair unblock process, given your behavior. how would you explain that the article creation is disruptive, since they have passed an independant third party review? Beatley (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) The article is not notable and of substandard quality; 2) you are under topic-ban of moving SvG articles to draft; 3) you evaded the topic-ban by saving some of the articles off-wiki and now posting them directly to the main space. Additionally, this is a copyright violation. This is pretty obvious since you did not even care to return the categories, leaving them commented.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * what would you know about quality? i did not move articles from draft, you deleted them. oh, is that what i did? are you sure i did not start from scratch? all it takes is some commented categories to troll you?
 * i take it, your quality improvement process is delete all the stubs - 18000 down 1000000 to go. it is a process unhinged from policy or consensus as shown by the two no consensus keeps. how many more do you want to do? and block editors who do not follow your directions that may happen to diverge from policy. i think you will find yourself shouting into the wind. Beatley (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dalina Bocour for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dalina Bocour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dalina Bocour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Eugénie Dalton
I have just made a massive (reducing from 3K to 0.5K) cleanup of Eugénie Dalton, which you created in March from the Welsh Wikipedia. Don't create articles from a source or wikiversion you don't understand or haven't checked. The Welsh article was bot created and maintained by Listeriabot with some incorrect query which gave a table of artists, not a table of works by Dalton. You badly copied that table, and also included sources which don't even mention her.

You were already blocked indefinitely for the "work" you did on SvG articles, and it turns out that your other work wasn't any better, so I heartily endorse the block. I'll now check the other articles you created or made large edits to. Fram (talk) 09:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I now see that you were indef blocked again as a Slowking4 sock, which explains a) the use of Wikidata, as you are one of the more active Wikidata proponents there, and b) the problematic editing and behaviour. I have deleted the article as a G5 deletion, better to simply get rid of it and start over from scratch. Fram (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * With 144 articles, are you going to take G5 to its logical conclusion? (Purely idle curiousity) -actually, on edit, I see quite a few of them have been edited by others since, so &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  09:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No idea. The first I checked were near-identical (copyvio) copies of SvG articles which were deleted in draft space, but which Beatley re-created under his own name soon afterwards. So these are double candidates for speedy deletion (if no one else made substantial contributions). The remainder I'll check for history and quality. If the vast majority are similar (the Dalton article really was dreadful), I'll probably simply delete all of them. Fram (talk) 09:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Which at least would have the advantage of neutralising the '' edits which someone has put into (I think) each of those articles. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  09:29, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, Nikkimaria has changed them to only take the (somewhat) reliably sourced entries, not all fields. Anyway, an article like Louise Droste-Roggemann has had enough editsto make it ineligible for G5, so I look at them on a case-by-case basis. Fram (talk) 09:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Elli Michler.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Elli Michler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ernst von der Recke.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ernst von der Recke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Georg Bonne.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Georg Bonne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Isabelle Nef.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Isabelle Nef.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:René Béhaine.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:René Béhaine.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Roy Lichtenstein Girl with Hair Ribbon.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Roy Lichtenstein Girl with Hair Ribbon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Teresa De Marzo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Teresa De Marzo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amelia Camboni.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Amelia Camboni.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cornelia Fabri.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cornelia Fabri.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Francesca Molfino.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Francesca Molfino.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurt Blanke.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Blanke.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Malvina Garrone Ronchi Della Rocca.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Malvina Garrone Ronchi Della Rocca.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (André François Miot de Mélito) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating André François Miot de Mélito, Beatley!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for creating this. It has been tagged as 'refimprove'."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Machine translations
Just adding this notice here for the community, regarding machine translations created by User:Beatley. (I'm aware that user is blocked since May 3, 2017, and may not be able to respond.) This user has created at least thirteen new articles at en-wiki based on translations using the ContentTranslation tool, and may have created many more without the tool. These translations are from (at least) these languages:, , , , Hungarian, and. (Several of these were since deleted, after a SPI.)

Imho, this user is monolingual, and has no knowledge of any language but English. All articles created by User:Beatley and involving translation should be considered suspect as far as accuracy and verifiability. Even articles with voluminous referencing may still be problematic, as incorrectly translated content may be contradicted by valid foreign-language references carried over from the original which are assumed to verify the translation but which, in fact, do not justify the faulty translations and which are not easily discoverable by users at en-wiki. All translations by this user should be flagged for examination by bilingual editors for verification. Translation templates such as proofreader needed, rough translation, hidden translation and others are available for this purpose.

In addition, the user did not always provide required translation attribution, so this should be added as soon as a missing attribution is noted. Mathglot (talk) 09:16, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * See also Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Slowking4.

Orphaned non-free image File:Malcolm Glazer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Malcolm Glazer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Malcolm Glazer.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Malcolm Glazer.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – PeeJay 10:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC) – PeeJay 10:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dutch Mason 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dutch Mason 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Enolia McMillan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Enolia McMillan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Antony Lambton.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Antony Lambton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alan Freeman.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Alan Freeman.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peter Law BBC.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Peter Law BBC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yao Wenyuan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yao Wenyuan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Samuel Colman (British painter).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Samuel Colman (British painter).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uploaded with VicuñaUploader


A tag has been placed on Category:Uploaded with VicuñaUploader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eric Arturo Delvalle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eric Arturo Delvalle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Steve Stavro.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Steve Stavro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leo Kadanoff.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Leo Kadanoff.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ignacio Ellacuría (activist).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ignacio Ellacuría (activist).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nakassis 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nakassis 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clemente Domínguez y Gómez-en.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Clemente Domínguez y Gómez-en.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brian Labone.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brian Labone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)