User talk:Beautifuel Storm


 * Beautifuel Storm is just a code name because I like the word storm!

All Citation Style 1 and Citation Style 2 templates report this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. This error may also occur when |title= cannot be linked with |url= because the citation also contains a conflicting |title-link= parameter.

URL-containing parameters and associated title parameters URL parameters	Title parameters A unique case exists for : if |pmc= or |doi= has a value, |url= is omitted or empty, and |title-link= does not point to an article, then |title= is automatically linked with the same URL as the PMC or DOI. This default behaviour can be overridden using |title-link=none/pmc/doi.
 * archive-url=	|title=
 * article-url=	|article=, |chapter=, |contribution=, |entry=, |section=
 * chapter-url=	|chapter=, |article=, |contribution=, |entry=, |section=
 * conference-url=	|conference=, |event=
 * contribution-url=	|contribution=, |chapter=, |article=, |entry=, |section=
 * entry-url=	|entry=, |chapter=, |article=, |contribution=, |section=
 * event-url=	|event=, |conference=
 * map-url=	|map=
 * section-url=	|section=, |chapter=, |article=, |contribution=, |entry=
 * transcript-url=	|transcript=
 * url=	|title=

Because URLs are ugly and generally uninformative, it is expected that editors should provide a meaningful title for each URL. In most cases this can be accomplished by using the |title= parameter.

To resolve this error, provide an appropriate title for the URL-containing parameter. In the case where |url= and |title-link= are contending for |title= you must choose which one to keep. Consider moving |url= or |title-link= to a more suitable parameter.

Pages with this error are automatically placed in Category:CS1 errors: bare URL (23,053 pages).[a]

Citation without a title of any form Information icon.svg Help desk Missing or empty |title= Missing or empty |series= This error occurs for Citation Style 1 and Citation Style 2 templates when all of |title=, |trans-title=, and |script-title= are omitted or left blank. At least one of these title parameters must be provided for each citation.

will show this error if |series= is omitted or left blank (even if a |title= is provided).

will show this error if |encyclopedia= has a value but |entry= (or another |chapter= alias) is omitted or left blank.

Sometimes this error occurs because an editor has used a CS1|2 citation as a shortened footnote when or one of the  family of templates would have been more appropriate. This error also occurs when an editor used but intended to use.

To resolve this error, provide a value for |title=, |trans-title=, and/or |script-title= or replace the CS1|2 template with a more appropriate template. If you are listing a periodical or an issue of a periodical in a bibliography rather than within tags, may be more appropriate.

Pages with this error are automatically placed in Category:CS1 errors: missing title (33,017 pages).[a]

October 2022
Hello, I'm Tropicalkitty. I noticed that in this edit to Star catalogue, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Star catalogue, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. WindTempos (talk • contribs) 23:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Beautifuel Storm (talk) 01:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:1101, you may be blocked from editing. Certes (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Hey Goodevening, what’s the issue. I’ve been writing a novel because of this site within the year of 2019 this site has become virals starting somewhere in April 2022 a starlink game has become off my book. It’s a good read just look it up.☺️ Beautifuel Storm (talk) 23:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * If your novel is notable (if it's won a major literary award, for example) then I'm sure someone will write an article about it soon – and there are good reasons why you should leave that writing to someone else. Until then, I'm afraid it's not a suitable topic for coverage in Earth, 1101, Nolan Crouse or any other article. Certes (talk) 23:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

All Smiles I’m very notable thanks. But I’ll leave the tags. Beautifuel Storm (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * With, you divert readers who hoped to read about a radio station to an article about a musical work. Your edits are consistently being reverted by a variety of editors, and it is becoming harder to assume good faith.  Please make only constructive contributions. Certes (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Comet for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Also, don't randomly promote a novel you wrote yourself at talk pages, thanks.  VickKiang  (talk)  00:34, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you but if you would have the time I mean like 15-30 minutes to ready the first chapter of the book.

(Wattpad ButterflowerZ, Starlink 4110, Starlink 1101, JDD Beautifuel Storm (talk) 00:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not the place to promote your book. There are other platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter, and your personal website, that are more fitted for the purpose. I'm sure that your book is excellent but it does not seem to meet WP:NBOOK, you don't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR (notability guidelines), and there is no need in promoting it at completely unrelated pages, which is unconstructive.  VickKiang  (talk)  00:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Comet, you may be blocked from editing.  VickKiang  (talk)  00:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Talk:Spitzer Space Telescope. ''This is your final warning. If you advertise your book again, you can expect to lose editing privileges indefinitely.'' Certes (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)