User talk:Beawalter

August 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kent Hovind. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 03:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Since the information included in the article about Kent Hovind is incorrect, I am within my rights to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beawalter (talk • contribs) 04:03, August 20, 2014‎


 * I suggest that you also read WP:Neutral Point of View. Meters (talk) 04:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

It amuses me how quickly the editing of obviously untrue and BIASED information gets a reaction. :-) I suggest that you re-read the article yourself and try not to present untruth to the public. The TRUTH is always the best answer even if it does ruffle the water. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beawalter (talk • contribs) 04:19, August 20, 2014‎
 * The reliable sources about the subject are all that matter for Wikipedia, even if there is some deeper (capital "T") Truth in which you might believe. WP:NPOV is indeed extremely clear that we are required to follow those sources even if they are strongly one-sided and negative towards the subject (that it would be bias to tip the balance anywhere other than what those sources say). DMacks (talk) 04:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * 'closed minded libral "scientists" ' is never going to be an acceptable addition to the article. You should add WP:SCAREQUOTES to the previous NPOV link to see why. It would also be a good idea to check your spelling and punctuation before saving article edits, and to learn to sign your talk page edits. Meters (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Either way, the information in this article IS indeed incorrect. I expected nothing less from Wikipedia. The majority of information found on this cite is laughable. Wikipedia is not considered to be a creditable source in most institutions and I can see why. Thank you for confirming the fact that Wikipedia is a biased cite. It was an eye opening experiment!