User talk:Bebemelon

May 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. S0091 (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Teresa Teng
Hi Bebemelon, as stated above you need to start a discussion on the article's talk page. So far in your editing history, which mostly surrounds this article, you have no engaged in discussion. Now is the time. S0091 (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

To stop continous vandalism and solution to it.
Hello! We need to talk here. This vandalism cannot continue like this for ever. This will only downgrade the credibilty of this page. We together need to find solution that satisfies both party and no further vandalism happens by anyone. Here is my suggestion what you can do: First, provide credible source that proves she is Chinese by nationality. If u do so, this might reduce the interference by some ppl. That's a better way to make ppl believe she is Chinese by nationality bcoz many ppl visit her wikipedia. We need to give solid and accurate info so that we can moreover improve the quality of this page.

Second possibility, you can change "chinese(ROC) singer" to "Chinese singer and a cultural icon from taiwan". Which might be better and could satisfy both parties bcoz you may edit and change it now but later other person will come who doesn't agree will change it to taiwanese singer again so this cannot continues and had to stop. Third, you can change her nationality to origin - Taiwan as it creates vandalism and confusion among many. Hope u listen and find solution to this. Also I hope u reply. Thank you! Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 08:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)