User talk:Beccahambridge

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lyng Hall School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lyng Hall School was changed by Beccahambridge (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969819 on 2012-01-01T14:21:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lyng Hall School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Lyng Hall School, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Your changes also appear to be biased and contain unimportant information. Before making changes ask yourself "Is what I'm adding information that's relevant and important, or is it subjective/biased?" The reference tag also needs an actual reference. Jargon777  Talk   04:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)