User talk:Beck162

Reminder
Do not contribute or delete materials if you'are incapable of doing so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.142.62 (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC) I don't even know what this means, but being that this IP address has only 3 contributions and they are all on my talk page I think an editor who has a problem, has no problem signing his comments. Robert Beck (talk) 20:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

This person wrongly edited Armoured (film) on wikipedia saying that he/she cleaned up sections and speculation. His/her idea of cleaning actually meant missing out important details of the movie. Unfortunately for Mr Einstein here, no one else before him/her thought it as speculation or requires cleaning. In fact, if you really watched the movie and had the adequate intelligence for double meanings and plots, you will understand that Mr Einstein got it wrong and rowing on his/her own boat. Well you know, he could be smarter than the 10-20 people before him/her. Becks162 failed to catch the drift that Ashcroft stopped a self-heist. It is not a speculation; rather it is a common and logical deduction that most laymen are capable of, put together as a result of the movie's circumstances, hints and facts which many people like Beck162 fail to see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.142.62 (talk) 07:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I did nothing of the sort. I edited the article as per Wikipedia standards, personal attacks are inappropriate and are unnecessary. Please see the article on Ownership_of_articles Robert Beck (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Spoken Articles
Hi Beck162. I noticed you have started a spoken version of the Enigma_machine article (according to the WikiProject_Spoken_Wikipedia page. I was wondering how this is coming. I am interested in recording this article if you are no longer interested or no longer have the time to do it. Thank you. Yelocab (talk) 12:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WilliamLedgerdTrip.jpg


The file File:WilliamLedgerdTrip.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)