User talk:Beckmannd21

Explanation of undo at Humane Society International Australia
Unfortunately, I've undone your first edit, at Humane Society International Australia; the sources, including the websites for Humane Society International Australia, Humane Society International and The Humane Society of the United States show them as being linked, and as being animal protection organisations. You may have been thinking of Royal Humane Society of Australasia, which is about people who put their lives at risk to save others.

Please accept my humble apologies, and feel free to come discuss at Talk:Humane_Society_International_Australia. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 08:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to A cappella. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm John from Idegon. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to David Phelps (musician) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''This isn't a blog. No one is interested in your opinion. Content here must be sourced to already published reliable sources. Btw, I think he's an inspiring musician too'' John from Idegon (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)