User talk:Becky Sayles/Archive 5

Bochorishvili
This is kinda new to me and this talk page i dont really understand what to message you. You want a deletion of my own surname?? Im not telling any lies and as you could see i used the word claim not meaning it is so.

if we will be talking in that order, you can delete 90% of all the stuff on this website.

Mirribotta (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

DMOJ
DMOJ is quite a prominent online judge with over 400 members. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobhob314 (talk • contribs)

Lawrence F Jindra biography
Hi Becky,

You recently declined the following article because the citations didn't contain enough depth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lawrence_F._Jindra,_M.D.

In preparing the biography I researched several other biographies of American Ophthalmologists and read the manual of style for living biographies and have tried very hard to write a quality bio but it continues to be rejected. An example of one bio, that was accepted, is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Charles_%28surgeon%29 When I look at the references provided, 4 out of the 6 are not independent of Dr. Charles and reference number 4 doesn't link to the cited page.

Can you please help me understand what to do differently/better. Any and all feedback is welcomed. Thank you! Kim Kimvale1025 (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * In regard to Steve Charles (surgeon), I was not involved in the creation of that article. It is possible that it should not have been, but I would have to take a closer look.  Many articles have issues that need to be addressed, it may not be helpful to make a direct comparison to that article.  Articles can still be deleted after having been created. As for the draft submission that was declined, Verifiability may be helpful.  In terms of depth of coverage, a reviewer will often look for citations that address the subject directly and thoroughly.  Many times editors use citations for specific facts, like a university faculty directory to support that a person is a professor.  While these may be accurate, they do not add much to support notability of a subject.  To improve the draft, I would suggest looking for sources that are about Jindra rather than merely mention him.Becky Sayles (talk) 02:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Peter Bjarkman web page
HI Becky, I'm not sure if I've done the right thing, adding this here instead of some place else, so please let me know on this count. I have two questions: (1) I did add a number of specific Categories to the end of the page. Is it done right, enough, and should I delete the request box or is that something you (or other admin person) do? (2) On the mobile site, it says that an edit on this page was done by TheRedPenofDoom, but I don't see anything indicating that on the regular web view from my computer (or on the talk page). How do I know/find who did the edit, and in this case, how do I thank that person? Thanks. Rbwilbur (talk) 02:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It appears that you have successfully added the article to a few categories. The format appears correct, but you should note that some of the categories (which appear in red) do not currently exist.  You can click on those and create them, or remove them from the article.  As with creating articles, creating a category should receive careful consideration before it occurs. Categorization may be helpful.  For your second question, you can click on "View history" at the top of most Wikipedia pages to see who has edited them.  From there, you can click on the date/time of a particular change to see the article up to that point.  You can also select different changes to see specifically what was changed.  See Help:Page_history. Becky Sayles (talk) 03:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Question about Religion for Atheists
Hi Becky, I noticed that you've declined my submission of Draft:Religion for Atheists. Would you please clarify what you mean by it having an undue emphasis on critical reception? --110.20.234.69 (talk) 06:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. The draft has a lead that is three sentences about the subject.  The remainder seems to be a list of things literary critics have said/written about the book.  It could be improved by adding more to the draft about what is addressed in the book.  See Category:GA-Class_Book_articles for examples.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've added a bit more already. Is there an expiry date where the draft will be deleted if I do not rework it and resubmit it? --110.20.234.69 (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * As of right now, I don't believe there's any expiry date. As long as the draft doesn't violate wikipedia policies, like copyright infringement for example, then it can remain a draft indefinitely.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  07:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. May I copy this conversation to the talk page of the draft?  It'll help me remember what was needed.  --110.20.234.69 (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
 Dear, HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions! From a fellow editor, --FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

My article on the Skinny Lister album Forge & Flagon
Hi Becky, you recently rejected my article on Forge & Flagon, an album by the band Skinny Lister, because it lacked reliable citations. Can you suggest any suitable sources I can use? I appreciate that those I have used include the record company and the band themselves, neither of which can be called impartial, I can also see that some of the webzines might not be considered reliable, but I have also cited The Independent and The Guardian, which as newspapers of record should be considered suitable. LuxfordC - 02/01/14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuxfordC (talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your contributions to wikipedia. In drafting this article, there are two related issues that will substantially help on the way to being accepted for creation.  The reliability of sources and notability. See  Identifying_reliable_sources and WP:Notability.  It seems that you have a sense of what reliable sources are, but there are more specific things to look for.  Reviews, even from reputable publications can contain a mix of straightforward facts and opinions.  The author of the review should be considered as well as the depth of coverage.  Take a look at references in The Dark Side of the Moon. Also, if you see that a reference is to an unreliable source then remove it, it may help the next editor to review the draft.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  22:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Apple revision request
Hi, Becky. I recently requested a small edit of the "Apple" page, which you rejected, telling me to review the instructions for making a semi-protected edit request. After reviewing the form once again, I'm having a little trouble understanding what I should do differently. Could you suggest some way in which I could improve my request? Is there something specific from the form which I am not completing correctly?

Thank you for your time.

Profludwig27 (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * 2. Please provide a specific description of the edit request, that is, specific text that should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not helpful and will often be rejected; the request should be of the form "please change X to Y because...".
 * 4.Please provide reliable sources if appropriate. All information in Wikipedia articles should be verifiable from reliable sources which are independent of the subject.
 * From what you originally requested it cannot be determined specifically what you would like to see changed.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * From what you originally requested it cannot be determined specifically what you would like to see changed.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I have added a line to the beginning of the request which states (hopefully) clearly the request. I understand now that it may have been confusing that I did not provide replacement text, the reason for which is that I am suggesting deletion of a small paragraph with no replacement text. If my justification for the request, provided below it, is not cogent, please let me know and I will clarify. Essentially, the poster is claiming that the phrase "an apple a day keeps the doctor away" was coined by a 21st-century author, in 2011, and we just all know that's not true, right?

Profludwig27 (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (sing)  @ 20:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  23:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)