User talk:BedTimeForBonzo

November 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 17:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Basket of Puppies 17:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from American University of Antigua College of Medicine. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [ page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 18:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on American University of Antigua College of Medicine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Basket of Puppies 19:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Basket of Puppies, I discussed this edit with you in particular on your profile page. I'm not trying to engage in an edit war with you. The user that has been posting this section keeps putting this clearly biased information on the page. My aim is it to maintain Wikipedia's neutrality code. I request that the American University of Antigua page be locked from editing so that this user may not put this on the page again.

Your recent edits to User talk:ZQPM2941 could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Basket of Puppies 20:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Mea culpa. This is something that I shouldn't have posted on the discussion page but messaged the contributor. It was not intended as a legal threat. I was just stating that it was illegal to post student names on a grade report on a public page. I'll correct this shortly.BedTimeForBonzo (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)BedTimeForBonzo

AS requested I have made changes to the aua-grading.png file. I completely blocked out all student names.

I hope this page doesn't become locked. That would make it seem like AUA is using wiki as an advertisement page instead of facts based application and that would be a shame and would show bias.

I am more than whiling to talk AUA about these facts, they can show their facts and I'll show my facts. I'm sorry I still don't see how showing AUA grading is bias. It's AUA's work, this is how they grade.... I think an example of bias would be comparing AUA's grading practices to another schools grading practices. Again, using the fact that the US used atomic weapons during wartime as a baseline, these are facts. There's no bias in posting facts. Let me know if you think the new posting I edited concerning the USMLE pass rates is bias. It's facts that AUA distributed and presented to their students! I don't know how anyone could say it's bias since it's AUA's data submitted by Dr. Victor Hrehorovich to every student in the SJMO 5th semester program.

ZQPM2941 (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)