User talk:Bedford/Archive11

Thank you
Thank you very much indeed for your help with and commitment to Tag & Assess 2008. May I please trouble you to comment at the post-drive workshop? Your feedback will help us to improve the next drive. Thanks in advance, -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 10:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

W Will and DYK
At the end of that long AN/I thread, you and Ottava Rima proposed dialogue with WW and control of her actions on DYK, and OR left a message on WW's talk page inviting discussion. WW did not edit for several days, but today has returned when her first action, ominously, was to archive her talk page. It seems that OR is out of action at present; would it perhaps be useful for you to take up the baton and leave WW a message outlining your proposals and inviting her to discuss them? JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Penguin?

 * ... oh you mean the waddling guy with the umbrella who never gets the Dark Knight...Victuallers (talk) 23:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC) ..

DYK - Union Monument in Perryville

 * A bit premature, but thanks anyways.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  21:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Cheers
Nice job! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The two related monuments concerning Perryville will be up in the next day or two.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  00:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 022. Delivered: 14:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Could I get your opinion.
Would you take a look at the discussion on Let_Freedom_Ring:_Winning_the_War_of_Liberty_over_Liberalism and see if you have an opinion on the matter. I believe there is an issue with undue wieght. I'd like your view as a former admin. Thanks. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. Besides, I've learned that "former admin" is a more prestigious title anyways.  It shows I have both integrity and fame. *smiles*-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  16:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Was getting that Lone Ranger feeling there for a while. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Hannity's book
You have removed material from the article while the discussion is still going on. Dock Hi 17:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh really? I hadn't noticed. *smirk*  It has no place in an encyclopedia; it was only there to smear Hannity, and thus removed per WP:LIBEL and WP:BOLD.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  17:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Funny Dock, you insist on leaving it there during this "discussion". Why not leave it off until the discussion is over? Niteshift36 (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Custom user box requested
Your highness, I have retrieved as you have commanded the box you desired. Several choices can be found at "Category:Edit user templates". By your leave--« Maryland stater » « reply » 20:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You have pleased me. I will cancel the beheading.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  20:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK question
Bedford, can you think of a suitable DYK hook for this article? Kelly hi! 13:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Messages about Krimpet
Bedford, why are you leaving all these messages to people ? It looks much like talk page spamming and trying to stir up trouble with someone you've recently had a dispute with. I acknowledge I'm not assuming good faith here, but it's hard to read that message any other way. I suggest shortening it to just the notification that the template's been deleted. If you want to dispute template deletion, deletion review is the way to go.--chaser - t 23:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I wanted to let people know that one of their userboxes was no good; I know I would appreciate if someone told me. In fact, since she deleted at least 3, maybe more, there is a pattern.  Krimpet also didn't bother discussing it before she deleted them wholesale.  There is a pattern there.  I was just giving people a friendly notice.  As I already told all the brunette people, and I didn't use the blonde or redhead, I chose to stop now.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  23:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If you have a problem with her, spamming uninvolved editors won't help. Please don't do it again.--chaser - t 23:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Like I said, all I did was let people know one (or more) of their userboxes got deleted.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  23:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

For those that want to comment on this controversy, CLICK HERE.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  00:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I, for one, appreciate the heads-up. Thanks, Bedford. Hope someone can stop her before she deletes the pornography one (I do love that picture). -- Plasma Twa  2  01:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * We should definitely "gauge" the popularity of that one. You might want to check the above link.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  01:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I also appreciated the heads up as it allowed me to notice the redlinked text along with an explanation of why it was redlinked on my userpage. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 02:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Perryville picture
I thought you might like to know that one of your pictures is now on the front page of Wikipedia.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  22:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. I almost never look at the front page so I would have missed it. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem; I like to let people know when things they might want to know happen.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  23:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

So much for staying under the radar...
but thanks for the star. :) --UsaSatsui (talk) 04:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * you're welcome. That one userbox of yours was just asking for it.  *laughs demonicly*-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  04:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

haha
Haha. You lost just like the south. Haha. IvoShandor (talk) 04:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I haven't. Now I can use the term "War of Northern Aggression" as much as I like, and I don't have to bother to update DYK or pursue vandals or try to get along.  Plus, I now have time to do something I didn't before.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  05:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Get over yourself
It was your own fault you got desysopped. Sceptre (talk) 16:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, it wasn't. You are just mad that you helped create another Kurt Weber, but one that is even more liked than him.  Like the Japanese, you thought you could get away with your Pearl Harbor job on the sleeping giant, not recognizing that eventually he'll meet you midway.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  16:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Kurt may have an overinflated sense of himself, but at least isn't a sexist pig. Sceptre (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * And really, being the new Kurt isn't something you should be proud of. Kurt willingly prides himself on being annoying. Sceptre (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Sceptre, please quit that. This is not helping matters at all - A l is o n  ❤ 21:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ahaha, seems like someone really needs to listen to their own advice.  naerii  17:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Sexist Pig? OMG! Theres the freaking smoking gun! Your the name caller, what makes you better than anyone else? Who do you think you are? Charles Edward 17:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I have left a message for Sceptre about this. Let's please not have back-and-forth on this continue from different parties. Jonathunder (talk) 17:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Please stop canvassing
Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_August_4#User:Bluedenim/Blondes. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "[t]he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice"1, such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking2. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not link to the discussion on their talk pages; I simply let them know that one of their userboxes was deleted and why. If there is a lot of votes of the dleetion review, its because they are interested (I don't remember seeing anyone I PMed actually vote in the deletion, although I have not done a careful count.)  Plus, anyone who had the userboxes in question are involved.  Why be afraid of the light; if someone tinkered with a userbox I used, I'd want to know.-- King Bedford I  Seek his grace  22:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think the objection is to notifying them that their userbox had been deleted, but rather the shots at User:Krimpet. If you had said "Hi, I thought I would let you know that the brunettes userbox has been deleted", or something, that would be fine. But rather, you say "I just thought I'd let you know that Krimpet (talk · contribs) took it on herself to delete the brunettes userbox you were using. This follows other subjects about women she has chosen to take on herself whether or not they should be on Wikipedia the past two weeks, including starting an "edit war" on the DYK section of the main page". I think that's primarily where the objection lies. Dreaded Walrus t c 22:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * And what part was incorrect?-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  22:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You were focusing on the person (Krimpet) and not the userboxes. This gives a strong impression that you have less interest in the boxes and more in dealing with Krimpet - A l is o n  ❤ 22:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * My interest is correcting the problem.-- King Bedford I <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  07:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Adding Articles for deletion/Montana in the American Civil War
doncram (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK
FYI, I tried an additional hook and citations on media coverage on the John Edwards DYK nom. Do you think it will any good? It's also up at "In the News". Kelly hi! 02:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a race. If it makes ITN, it will be disqualified from DYK.  It should be good enough, but some are squeamish abut political DYKs.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  02:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks for the inside track. This is only my second experience with DYK and first with ITN. Kelly  hi! 03:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Bedford, I hope you understand that the current situation involves one DYK swapped out for another without a penalty to the contributor, whereas your concern has many different (and deeper) ramifications. If you would like to talk about it, you know how to contact me. Thanks. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Rape comparison
You used the word "gangrape" in a recent ANI discussion. That was, in my opinion, an extremely poor choice of analogy. To compare the situation that resulted in your being deadminned to the forcible rape by multiple individuals of a woman (or man) is incredibly insensitive. There are those on this project who have suffered greatly from actual rape. Comparing the loss of a few buttons to that experience is not fair to them in any way. Regards, S.  D. Jameson 01:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Would you prefer "internet gangrape" as a term? It was, after, a group of people getting a sense of power on another's expense.-- King Bedford I <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  02:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As Lar says, it would be better if you simply discontinued use of the analogy. What happened then is nothing like a rape. S.  D. Jameson 04:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

I'd prefer you not use the term at all. It's inappropriate. ++Lar: t/c 04:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

(after ec) I'm with the others. Same with "lynched". They're strong terms, and a bit inappropriate. Dreaded Walrus t c 04:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I concur. There is absolutely no valid comparison to be made between rape and being de-sysopped. Doing so only trivializes the horror that is rape and sexual violence. I'm sure that's not your intent here, right? - A l is o n  ❤ 04:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Consult a decent dictionary. Heck, even dictionary.com says "4.	an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside. "   What can I say; I have an awesome vocabulary (helps when writing prose and devising new puns).-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  15:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Consult some common sense. You said "gangrape", which has no such definition. Trying to play semantical games in a vain attempt to justify your vulgarity is quite unbecoming. S.  D. Jameson 23:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Bedford, do you understand that using rape to describe your being desysopped for something viewed as sexist would just cause the same people to become upset? It may be fair or it may be not. I am not one to decide. I just wanted to point out this. I hope you understand. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * My brother, when playing Halo this morning: "Ah fuck, we're getting raped here". Funny. The people above remind me of vultures. From anyone else nobody would notice, but as you're the current hate figure of the moment I guess it's OK to harass you over trivialities. Hang in there.  naerii  15:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Three things: First, I have at no point been a part of any disagreement with Bedford. I saw what happened, and that's all. Second, what your brother said was said in private, between buddies. That's a very different thing. If I'd have been one of the buddies, I would have said something, but I wasn't. Third, referring to a deadminning as being raped is offensive, whoever says it. I would have called anyone I saw making that vulgar and offensive comparison on it. I have no "dog in the hunt" as far as Bedford is concerned. The only concern I have is for the completely inappropriate nature of the analogy. I think anyone who either loves someone who has been a victim of an actual rape, or has been a victim of one themselves would have found it equally so. S.  D. Jameson 20:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You are forgetting certain things. It was not just a deadminning, but a group assault on one individual, smearing him, demanding he resign (some of whom won't resign now when asked, but I should have willingly do so), and having him then get deadmin without due process before calmer heads could prevail.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  21:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Your internet experience last week (all the varying parts of it) in no way resembled a rape. Continuing to defend that analogy is not only poor form, but really quite offensive. S.  D. Jameson 21:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Continuing to defend censorship, "Jameson", is just as stupid. LFOD (talk) 00:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm asking Bedford to have a certain level of decency that seemed lacking in comparing his relatively minor Wikipedian dustup to a "gangrape." A bit of self-censorship is often required to maintain a basic level of social graces, wouldn't you agree? S.  D. Jameson 22:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If there was decency, I would have never been desysoped. If what happened to me ever happens to you, you will feel the same way.  That is all I will say on this.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  23:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I can honestly say that if I ever decide to stand for RfA, am fortunate enough to pass, and unfortunate enough to lose +sysop (whatever the circumstances), I would never describe how I felt as being "gangraped." I've known someone who was raped, Bedford. There's just no comparison, and it's completely insensitive to not self-censor that kind of inflammatory rhetoric. I truly wish you would simply retract it, and that would be that. S.  D. Jameson 03:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Jameson is not asking (from what I can tell) that Bedford be censorsed here. He/she is asking that Bedford refrain from using a word in a way which many editors feel is inappropriate and unnecessarily inflames the situation. An editor who doesn't understand that working with other wikipedians means it's wise to frame your comments in such a way that you get your point across effectively and don't inflame others for no good reason is not a very good wikipedian. If you were talking about the saga which started the whole thing, then that seems completely irrelevant and so I suggest you bring it up elsewhere Nil Einne (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Conservatism project
Yes, I'd be interested in being involved if such a project ever got started. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

The article
It was the article. I could barely follow the storyline - so much so that I couldn't risk giving it a quick copyedit without reading the reference first, which I didn't have time to do. Any chance you could polish it up a bit? Gatoclass (talk) 10:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Much better, I can understand it now, thanks :) Gatoclass (talk) 11:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Infoboxes for ACW states
I created two infoboxes for the states (Template:Infobox U.S. State/Terr. ACW for the yanks, Template:Infobox Confederate State ACW for the rebs) for consideration. If used, your nav templates already on the pages in the infobox position could be horizontalled and placed lower.

What is His Majesty's opinion? Kresock (talk) 22:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * We'll just have to test them for appearance.  WHatever looks better for the majority, especially those closer to GA status.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  22:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Applied new template to Florida page with some tweaks. Will not to others until I get some feedback. Any of the numbers I cited in it would make good DYK material. Kresock (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There's not 5x expansion in prose, so it would not qualify for DYK. Looks good, otherwise.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  08:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

blonds and brown hair
Hello. I would just like u to explain me better the whole "blonds and brown hair" userboxes issue, and what is exactly the problem. Thank u in advance.--Vule91 (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Some women seem to think that if there is male interest on female beauty, then females are reduced. If I made the accurate analysis of the real though processes of the women who object to these userboxes, I'd receive more excrement thrown my way.  I did chuckle what someone said someplace about this fiasco and the 19th Amendment.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  23:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Message
I've sent you an email. Masterpiece2000  ( talk ) 04:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou
Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 09:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Baseball Talk
Hi, I'm not really sure how to add sources into the Baseball Talk page when many of them come off the checklist card or from the audio of the actual cards. Thanks. OddibeKerfeld (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain more fully...
You placed a neutrality tag on Camp Iguana a few months ago. That tag, when instantiated, tells readers to look to Talk:Camp Iguana for the discussion of why the tag was placed.

Did you mean to leave an explanation -- but got called away, and distracted, and never got around to it?

I don't mean to belittle your efforts. Quality control is important. But, since you are an experience contributor I am sure you must be aware that some irresponsible contributors go around adding bogus and inappropriate tags to articles simply because they don't agree with the neutrally expressed referenced material those articles contain. I am sure you are aware that these drive-by taggers never bother to explain why they placed those tags. I am sure you must have come across inappropriately placed tags, which are simply disruptive and a disservice to readers.

A couple of years ago I decided to try to resolve tags placed on some articles I contributed to. I started leaving notes, asking for explanations from the tag placers -- with mixed results.

I asked on WP:AN/I how much responsibility I had to advise tag placers of the questions I had about their tag placement. I asked how long I should wait after asking for clarification before I removed an apparently abandoned tag. I thought I might be advised to wait a week.

I was surprised at the reply my question received. One administrator said I had no obligation to ask for clarification. This administrator replied, on WP:AN/I, that if the tag placer didn't leave their explanation for their tag placement within 24 hours, I should feel free to remove it without warning.

I see you are an administrator. So I am going to assume you meant to explain yourself, and got called away first.

On the off chance that you do routinely place the neutrality tag, without explanation, I will repeat the points I used to point out to tag placers that the rest of us aren't mind-readers. That, without an explanation, other readers can't even tell in which direction the tag placer thought the article violated neutrality. And, if the tag placer doesn't record their concern, the rest of us can't know when their concern has been adequately addressed.

Some other wikipedia contributors have drafted little essays. And some of those have proven popular enough that other contributors quote them as if they were policies or guidelines. I wrote one on "obviousness". I wrote: "nothing is obvious". On the off chance you thought you didn't need to explain why you placed the tag because you assumed the explanation was "obvious" let me assure you it absolutely is not obvious.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 07:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been so long, I forgot what the problem was. We are talking April, after all.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  07:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Doncram
Hi, I've realized that you had a conflict with Doncram; have you talk to him and discussed? I urge you to do so, H2H (talk) 07:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There have been discussions, but it is fruitless. He thinks he can order me around, which I refuse to let happen.  He's on DYK just to harass me, and he gets encouraged by Gatoclass.  Good writers like me getting abused for trying to add to WP is quite sad.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  08:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Missing hooks
I am on the verge of proposing a DYK topic ban for you because I am tired of the unco-operative attitude and the bad faith accusations. I would therefore like you to find those missing hooks and add them to the archive. If you are unwilling to do so, I feel I will have little choice but to go ahead with the above proposal. Try doing the right thing for once. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 08:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Kay Chorao
Thank you for the nomination and the talk page notification. I'll have a look. Best, --PeaceNT (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

RFC
Hi Bedford -- I just saw your comment on FloNight's talk page and thought I should comment. I think your complaint is unwise. You make accusations of broken policies, but the evidence to substantiate this is not strong. Wikipedia does not consider it prohibited for editors to ensure that other editors are keeping within policy -- harassment is a serious accusation and requires strong evidence to substantiate it. What you provide is, I think, a long way short of what is necessary. I strongly advise that you do not go ahead with this RFC -- it will only reflect badly upon you and you will not achieve the objectives that you seek. Sam Korn (smoddy) 12:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * So, in other words, let someone continue to harass me and make a nuisance of himself?-- King Bedford I <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  12:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I am suggesting that what you are perceiving as harassment is, in fact, not. My suggestion to you is that the mere fact of a user repeatedly disagreeing with you specifically does not in itself constitute harassment or a breach of Wikipedia etiquette and that any attempt by you to pursue him over it is not going to be to your advantage.  Sam Korn (smoddy) 13:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Indianapolis/On this day...
Hello again, Bedford. We have a minor issue with the "On this day" feature at Portal:Indianapolis. It seems that the ... within the titles are making the pages un-editable to anyone who is not an admin. So I made an inquiry at Administrators' noticeboard and found out that the ... were the problem. Well I'm considering moving all the pages so that they do not have the ... in the title. Just thought I'd check with you first to make sure it's a good idea and if you have any better ideas. Also if you want you can go ahead with the moves because I will be gone for most of the day (Saturday, August 16th). Thanks and have a great day! :) <b style="font-family:Neuropol; color:#003366;">HoosierState</b><sup style="font-family:Latha; color:#003366;">Talk 15:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

I bet you'll see a problem here
Take a look at Southern culture of honor and tell me if you see the same POV pushing that I do. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Mayor Ballard pic
Hmmm looks exactly like the image from a Howey Politics Indiana article.

By the way, what you think about my Portal:Indianapolis/On this day... proposal? If you approve, I'll get started. <b style="font-family:Neuropol; color:#003366;">HoosierState</b><sup style="font-family:Latha; color:#003366;">Talk 04:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

200

 * Thats all the awards given out and up to date. Could you give out a few when the spaces develop? You'll have to be quick or I'll beat you (again :-) ). Its a good way to gain support and make friends. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

James Whitcomb
Hey Bedford! I know you have been working on masonry stuff and I came across some info you might find interesting - Governor James Whitcomb was the first person knighted in Indiana, I added that to his article with the source if you want to check it out. He did some other stuff too. Charles Edward 18:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 023. Delivered: 22:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Hey Bedford
Just to let you know that I believe you should never have had your sysop powers removed. You were the one following policy, not the prudes who objected to your perfectly encyclopedic DYK nomination.--Candyflipping Platypus (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

GA Review of Thomas Hines
Hi! I have completed the GA review of Thomas Hines, with the full review being located at Talk:Thomas Hines/GA1. I have put the article on hold to allow you time to deal with a few minor concerns. If you have any questions, you can ask on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Trolling
Trolling like this is not helpful in any way. Please refrain from such activities. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not trolling; it's called setting the record straight. Anyways, the point is made, so I'll just sit back here, playing Final Fantasy X, and enjoying the show.  Wish I had some popcorn.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  23:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it trolling myself either - but it is essentially the same behavior as what Sceptre was caught using an IP to do. So given the consequences he is currently experiencing it ought to be sort of obvious that you should cut it out yourself.  Please do cease and desist, as I think you promised to do in that last statement.  GRBerry 20:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Not really; I didn't vandalize his page, which is something he did to mine a month ago. Quite frankly, I am just reveling in schadenfreude, and am planning to enjoy some nachos if this keeps up.  (Never could find any popcorn in the house, sigh.)-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  20:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Confession
I shamelessly steal userboxes from your page. Wonder if we could get one that has the old Georgia Flag and the new one crossed out with Sonny Lied and link to the new georgia flag controversy ?--Die4Dixie (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * We probably have the old Georgia flag somewhere on Wikipedia. Shouldn't be hard to do.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  15:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--Die4Dixie (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Incidentally, if you're keen to keep your assessing skills honed, we are currently very short of reviewers for Milhist A-Class reviews. Broadly, the five A-Class criteria are just beefed up versions of the B-Class criteria and anyone with B-Class experience should have no trouble with them. Also, as a reminder, in the wide-ranging A-Class review, it is not necessary to comment on all five criteria: if you're short of time, you can simply focus on the aspects that interest you (sources, comprehensiveness, prose, graphic content or whatever). You can track which articles are up for A-Class using this template:

All the best, -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 07:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I am not sure if I am ready for assessing if something is A, as I'm not that interesting in picking nits.  But I think I can do mass assessing, which is why I'm throwing my hat into the ring.-- King Bedford I  <sup style="color:green;">Seek his grace  03:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Love the sig
"seek his grace" --  marvelous. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 024. Delivered: 15:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)