User talk:Beebeenewan

October 2023
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  23:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am Beebeenewan and I have readded the thing with a reference. Beebeenewan (talk) 23:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It said "sj doesn't want to be referred to by any third-person singular personal pronouns, including "they" when used with a singular referent", so therefore, it is offensive to use they/them/their to refer to sj Miller. Beebeenewan (talk) 08:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * "Not wanting something" and "being offended by something" are not the same thing. If Miller is offended by being referred to as "they", there needs to be a source saying that specifically. ... disco spinster   talk  11:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * sj Miller would still get extremely angry when you use they/them/their to refer to sj Miller. Beebeenewan (talk) 23:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at sj Miller shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Funcrunch (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)