User talk:Beejayhelper

July 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Windows ME. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve University Parkway (Winston-Salem)
Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Beejayhelper, thanks for creating University Parkway (Winston-Salem)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 03:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of University Parkway (Winston-Salem)


The article University Parkway (Winston-Salem) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails to establish why this busy street is notable enough for an article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Fredddie™ 05:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Silas Creek Pkwy


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Silas Creek Pkwy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Silas Creek Parkway. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Silas Creek Parkway. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Sounder Bruce  23:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

The reason I added a new page called Silas Creek Parkway is because NC-67 is not fully Silas Creek Parkway. On the separate page I want to add more information about Silas Creek Parkway. You guys need to remove the redirection so if people search 'Silas Creek Parkway' it will not have to redirect you to NC-67. Thank You. Beejayhelper (talk) 14:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CiCi's - Beyond Pizza
Hello Beejayhelper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CiCi's - Beyond Pizza for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Cicis.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:JGES.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JGES.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JGES.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:JGES.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:47, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:WSFCS Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WSFCS Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Promethean-ActivBoard-300-Pro-Fixed-System.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Promethean-ActivBoard-300-Pro-Fixed-System.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Promethean-ActivBoard-300-Pro-Fixed-System.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Promethean-ActivBoard-300-Pro-Fixed-System.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Washuotaku. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Interstate 40 Business (North Carolina) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --WashuOtaku (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm Washuotaku. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to U.S. Route 52 in North Carolina‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. --WashuOtaku (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Route 421 in North Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --WashuOtaku (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Route 421 in North Carolina, you may be blocked from editing. --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Interstate 40 Business (North Carolina). --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Interstate 40 Business (North Carolina)
I think may have been wrong to revert you. I added a couple of sources that I hope will convince this person.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:28, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenersville Loop Road
Hello Beejayhelper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kenersville Loop Road for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 18:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Png-full-341-3415440 image-description-walmart-neighborhood-market-logo-vector.png
Thanks for uploading File:Png-full-341-3415440 image-description-walmart-neighborhood-market-logo-vector.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:KhW3R3Zj7btJK9A0A5gzrYDjE.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KhW3R3Zj7btJK9A0A5gzrYDjE.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Winston-Salem, North Carolina, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kernersville Loop Road


The article Kernersville Loop Road has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GEOROAD. Little coverage in secondary sources. As of last December, this road was still in the planning stages.  I was able to locate just two news articles--in local papers--about this unbuilt road."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Walmart Neighborhood Market logo.png


The file File:Walmart Neighborhood Market logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Image of a unnotable topic that has since been redirected. No obvious value in transferring to Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

"Promethean ActivBoard" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Promethean ActivBoard. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 18:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wade Avenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expressway. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Carr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

North Carolina Highway 67
Hey! Not sure we have met, but I'm one of the other active editors for NC highways. I saw you have made some edits to North Carolina Highway 67 in the last few days. I want to ask you to please be careful about what you are editing. Some of your changes in the route description created convoluted, run-on sentences that I have since had to revert. My plan is to nominate the article for Good article status soon. To pass, the article needs to be both grammatically correct and there should be an absence of edit wars. I'm concerned that your edits might contribute to the article failing in both respects. I am not saying you cannot edit, but please read over what you are saying. It seems that you care a lot about Winston-Salem roads, and having a Good Article in the region would be a big boost, so please help me ensure this passes. Thanks!--Ncchild (talk) 04:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)


 * By the way, I hope this did not come across as snippy or passive aggressive. If it did, that may be a by-product of me writing the message after midnight and I apologize. I just want to make sure the article passes GA standards, which you may see it needed some last minute work. Above all, you are a valued editor so I don't want you to think I'm asking you to completely shy away. Ncchild (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ncchild. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.
 * Just to help you understand, WikiProject U.S. Roads uses major intersections for the junction list on all roads that are not completely freeways. Please see North Carolina Highway 132, U.S. Route 76 in North Carolina, and U.S. Route 10 in Michigan. These are all peer reviewed articles that have a mix of surface intersections and exits, as does NC 67. They all use major intersections.--Ncchild (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Carolina Highway 11, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 587.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 158, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expressway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 40 in North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Point.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Awesome Wonder moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Awesome Wonder. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby  (talk · contribs) 21:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Awesome Wonder (June 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Awesome Wonder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Awesome_Wonder Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ratnahastin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Awesome_Wonder reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on No One Else (Kurt Carr album)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page No One Else (Kurt Carr album), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Beejayhelper&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1227769959 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No_One_Else_(Kurt_Carr_album)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1227769959%7CNo%20One%20Else%20(Kurt%20Carr%20album)%5D%5D Ask for help])

See WP:NALBUMS
Hello. Regarding your creations of album articles, please see WP:NALBUMS. If you cannot find any news sources on an album, particularly no reviews from notable outlets (and/or the only source is its AllMusic listing), it's most likely not notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Thanks.  Ss  112   12:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)