User talk:Beekavan

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to TMAP has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: TMAP was changed by Beekavan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951548 on 2020-10-12T15:12:10+00:00

Speedy deletion nomination of TMAP Body of knowledge for quality engineering in IT


A tag has been placed on TMAP Body of knowledge for quality engineering in IT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.be/books?id=ICHXDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT18&lpg=PT18&dq=%22Organizations+can+only+be+successful+when+properly+supported+%22&source=bl&ots=-0ppenhOEL&sig=ACfU3U3l7vmCDOHIu1B0po6JOwMHUIXvOg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiFn9yy4sDtAhVvMewKHSc3B9sQ6AEwAXoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Organizations%20can%20only%20be%20successful%20when%20properly%20supported%20%22&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 11:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TMAP Body of knowledge


A tag has been placed on TMAP Body of knowledge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Retswerb (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TMAP Body of knowledge


A tag has been placed on TMAP Body of knowledge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:COI / WP:PAID editing
Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID, and please stop creating or editing articles closely related to TMAP, Sogeti, ... You are free to go to the talk pages of these articles to suggest neutral improvements, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote your company, a product they deliver, or anything similar. Fram (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Beekavan (talk) 10:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Dear admin, I have a request to unblock my account. I am new on Wikipedia and understand that my article over TMAP looks like an promotion or advertisinmg article. I have rewrite and removed all references that look like advertisements and now only explain what TMAP is and how today's organizations can use it with the rapidly changing techniques in IT. That TMAP stands for quality in IT delivery. What needs to be done to get my blocked account active again?

Beekavan (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)This article was written because there is not yet a good article about TMAP (Test Management Approach). TMAP has been around for more than 25 years and a lot has changed, due to thousands of users and changing technology. It was therefore high time that an article was published about this, in which I also wanted to emphasize that several books have been published about this, which explain this development over time. Also that it is a worldwide test approach for which training and certifications can be obtained. This is to emphasize the importance of TMAP, without the intention of promotion, but to assist organizations in their search (via Wikipedia, among others) for suitable methods to set up / change their systems qualitatively and to safeguard them for the future.
 * You have a conflict of interest. Wikipedia isn't the place for you to promote TMAP. Please reread WP:COI and WP:PAID and WP:PROMO. After you have done so, if you have specific questions about those policies, please ask them here. --Yamla (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Beekavan (talk) 16:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Dear admin, I am trying to understand why my account has been blocked because of my TMAP body of knowledge article. Can you help me create a Wikipedia page where I only want to share factual information about a commonly known approach, which also includes certifications. For example, I see a page about "Scaled Agile Framework", which I think is similar to TMAP.

What makes the difference between an acceptable and an unacceptable contribution on Wikipedia?

Thank you in advance for your response that will enable me to write an article that meets the Wikipedia guidelines. Sincerely, Beek, a. van