User talk:Beetstra/Sandbox

Fair use rationale for Image:Skittlesgum.jpg
Image:Skittlesgum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Beetstra
sorry, I wanted to send you an email but there was no possibility and I write you here. Sorry! Dear Wikipedia Workers: iam Miguel Jordan (esiomajb) which blog is reported as spam. Iam working in a lot of wikis colaborating, specially spanish (as user esiomajb) and english ones (user esiomajb1). Iam not trying to generate spam but to link some blogs (including mine of course) of people and groups that work on such topics and also that help people suffering problems with phenomena associated to those files. Please inform me if there is any problem when making this! I do not want to generate spam! Thanks. Best regards, Miguel (user esiomajb and esiomajb1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esiomajb1 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 12 February 2008
 * I would like you to review our conflict of interest guideline, and probably the other external link-related policies and guidelines here: WP:NOT, WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:FOOT). Thanks.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 13:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the answer! I was included time ago and then deleted and then included and só on. It is difficult to know if the people cited have cited themselves using alias from others or different alias in order to avoid beeing chased but who chase them?. But Iam beeing sincere and also I supported the whole information that some people asked me in order to accept be mentioned. Best regards, and thanks for the comprehension. Michel (esiomajb1) 134.2.102.192 (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

134.2.102.192 (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)