User talk:Behappy 29

Speedy deletion nomination of Pavel Stankevych


A tag has been placed on Pavel Stankevych requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 22:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Pavel Stankevych for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel Stankevych is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pavel Stankevych until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 20:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello Behappy 29. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Behappy 29. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 14:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Praxidicae User:Praxidicae Sorry for misunderstanding I am not paid from anyone.I just trying to make this article better proving more facts.Behappy 29 (talk) 21:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Care to explain how this is your own work in that case? Praxidicae (talk) 02:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello User:Praxidicae I am so sorry I am new on Wikimedia I was thinking if I founded this image on Internet is freely licensed in the public domain and i should put that is my own work.I am so sorry for misunderstanding next time I will be more attentive. Then should I delete this image from Wikimedia ? Behappy 29 (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Revert my edit
Hello, I have recently made an edit on the page Pavel Stankevych which I want you to revert. ArjunKapoor¹² (talk) 17:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello I fixed that Behappy 29 (talk) 17:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Mondial du Cirque de Demain moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mondial du Cirque de Demain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Please wanted to ask you can you explain one thing week ago i got message that you checked an article Pavel Stankevych.But then the people deleted this page.I am disagree with this decision.Because he meets criteria WP:SPORTSPERSON or WP:ENT.Please let me know your thoughts because I saw already message that you checked this article.And then another people just deleted.ThanksBehappy 29 (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, User:onel5969 Thank you.I will tag more information about Cirque DeDemain.

Concern regarding Draft:Mondial du Cirque de Demain
Hello, Behappy 29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mondial du Cirque de Demain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mondial du Cirque de Demain


Hello, Behappy 29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mondial du Cirque de Demain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)