User talk:Bejnar/Archive 9

Archive 9
 * July 2010 - December 2010

Nazoo Anaa
You listed Nazoo Anaa for deletion and I re-wrote the article.--Khostafg (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Rioni of the City of Rome
There is a discussion on whether articles on the rioni of the City of Rome should follow the naming convention for Italy, or should be treated differently. I have notified you as you were previously involved in the discussion on a Naming convention for Italian cities. Please feel free to add your comments at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)/Archives/2010/July. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Homs/Hims
The more important article is Hims itself; my article title was based off of that. I was following some consensus there from when I did copyediting work on that article, but you may want to talk to User talk:Al Ameer son or User talk:Zozo2kx, as I believe they may be able to give you an explanation. I wanted continuity in the place names throughout the encyclopedia as a whole, but I don't have an opinion on either name.  Spencer T♦ C 01:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You recently participated in a discussion at Talk:Hims Gap. You might be interested in a move proposal at Talk:Hims.  —   AjaxSmack   01:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Chihuahuaa
This is purely a personal view but there are a few things I notice: 1) you're right about the old template being lerss easy to read, but it is the standard form used by other states (see Template:Durango and Template:Coahuila; 2) it does allow for more items about the state to be added in, as in the case of Coahuila; 3) the new template needs its redlinks fixed and is very big, but it is more easily read; 4) it looks good as part of the Chihuahua article. What I'd suggest is that the old template should be kept for the individual municipalities, but that the format of the new one should be used within each state article as a section of the article. That would mean converting from a template into a single section, since single-use templates aren't really liked on WP. Finally, whatever happens, it should be discussed with WP:MX first. Grutness...wha?  23:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Sir Ronald Ivelaw-Chapman
Hi Bejnar, I have undone your changes, as Sir Ronald was very definitely co-author of the book Wings over Kabul. See reference http://openlibrary.org/books/OL4940251M/Wings_over_Kabul for bona fides. I am his grandson, and took part with my father during the books authoring and publishing. Sir Ronald is co-write and author of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allegrilover (talk • contribs) 18:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Response at User talk:Allegrilover. --Bejnar (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Bejnar apologies for the the errata and for overlooking your other edits, I will use the compare option more efficiently next time. best (Allegrilover (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC))

Anwar al-Awlaki
Your edit undid at least 39 revisions (perhaps more since the newest matching rev was a revert). Were you using a buggy script that loaded the old version of the page? The script may need fixing. Also, the ABC news link works for me -- it's definitely not dead as you indicated. Thundermaker (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Singkaling Hkamti
HI. I'm currently doing a drive to cleanup Burmese towns and townships and get some info.references written into them. As you did a good job with Singkaling Hkamti wondered if you could help out?♦  Dr. Blofeld  17:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

That's great. One thing though. If you are adding infoboxes to towns please copy the shortened "clean" infobox you now see in Budalin (click edit page to view it). Most of the infoboxes at the moment are unnecessrily long. It would be nice to get some district locator maps at least.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm currently starting the villages in Hkamti Township. If you can google book search any title at random and try to find some mention in a British gazetteer with some info to add to any one of the stubs like Allagappa this would be great. I'm gradually working through each township of Burma. I hope eventually most can be expanded if the village is mentioned in google books and maybe in a few years there will be an increasing amount of content available online....♦ Dr. Blofeld

Region
Nothing to do with that. I changed the name back to Division so I could edit the template. The name= field part of the template has to match the name of the nav box name in the header, otherwise you can edit it directly. If you change the name of the template to Template:Sagaing Region then the template name can be Sagaing Region.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

RfC on Featured List Criteria section 3b
Hello. You are receiving this message as you previously posted in the ongoing RfC on whether Featured List Criteria section 3b should be modified or eliminated. Based on feedback and commentary received during the section-by-section analysis of the current criteria, I have proposed a new version of the criteria here. I would like your input on ways to improve and refine this proposal, in hopes of reaching consensus to implement this change to the criteria. Thank you for your attention. –Grondemar 17:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

The pits
Very possible it isn't properly cat'd. (TBH, I thought it'd been merged & dealt with long ago. :( I'm in no way qualified to merge it, myself.)  TREKphiler  any time you're ready, Uhura 14:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

excellent
good to see someone else trying to clear out the mess at Navajo Nation... do you think "administrative divisions" might be better in the "geography"-sections? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yepp, point taken, I was just wondering.
 * As for the list, I would rather not include off-reservation towns. My ideal would be to treat this along the model of country-articles. My main contention before I re-arranged it was that it was a muddle between the geographic/political entity and the ethnicity. I would like to see this one cover the political entity as much as possible.
 * And yes, geographical features and such should be there (with refs!); what you see is basically just a preliminary re-arrangement to get the overall structure going. I will now dig up some stuff to fill it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 16:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Palauk Subtownship
Hi can you merge this into the Township article? Its just it will start to get unmanageable if we have articles on the sub townships too!♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

If you have access to subtownships if you could list them in the township articles this would be great. Eventually I want to have articles on all of them and of course villages organized in subtownships but priority is making the township articles more comprhensive I think.. Did you see my article on Kutkai?♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Keep up the great work!♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Looks good. Can you find out the seat town for Taninthayi Township. It can't be Dawei... Is Taninthayi a town as well as region. I thought that was Dawei?♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Because it seems Dawei Township in Dawei District are seperate. Taninthayi is given as in Myeik District.♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Can you fill out an article in Tanintharyi and add a hat note syaing this about the toqn see Tanintharyi Region for region? Odd that we don't have an article on it.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks. The other one is Kiyttsu Township which is red linked in the nav box as Kyunsu Township. Which name is correct?♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

A redirect and mention former name then? I will look into expanding the town of Tanintharyi and the Great Tenasserim River this week. Both have a wealth of sources from the British period..♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:43, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Done. Can you find the coordinates for Kyunsu Township, I can't seem to find them under that name.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:25, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

No I don't think so, Mergui is Myeik. The map I have of Burma shows that the Kyunsu Township neighbors Myeik Township to the south.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah welldone. Actually if you match up the maps you'll see Kyunsu is actually the new name for Kanmaw which is indeed in the Mergui islands but you had the wrong island in your coordinates. Look at the google map now in Kyunsu Township see here.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Can you list the subtownships?♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

I started Kyunsu. Looks right on the map I made too.. AH. looks like we had an article already on the island Kanmaw Kyun. Which name is better? You decide, you;ve done a great job tonight.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Kyun
Thanks for letting me know. Appreciate it. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Apalon
Hello - you moved article about Apalon company from Apalon to Apalon (company). The new article is about a village in Burma. Don't you think it will be appropriate to create a page called Apalon (village) for it? Please try typing Apalon into Google and see what is more relevant to this particular name --  --Billystut (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If you look in Google Scholar, you will find more for the place in Burma. --Bejnar (talk) 19:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't able to find much info about the place in Burma in Google Scholar. But google news archives retured more articles about Apalon as a company. Updated the page with some more links from media such as Cnet and others.--Billystut (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There is not a lot of information in Google Scholar, just more. The Wikipedia is not news, although the news may provide citations when better reliability is not present. --Bejnar (talk) 19:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Trans-Dniestr, User:Transnistriei
You have got a reply. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

You have got a reply. Hope it helps and the "perceived problem" can be solved. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 20:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

You have got a reply. I wouldn't like to answer the last question, the thing is, it would be OR, I wouldn't have reliable sources to prove any answer. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

You have got a reply. :-) Si recuerdo bien has editado articulos de estados de Mejico? Pienso que pasaron 5 anos mas o menos. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And we had a little problem. But we solved it. And you know what: My first blocks ever I received for creating stubs for Mexican states, some was under IP and some got deleted. They were really stubby, almost only had the ISO 3166-2 code. Yeah, country subdivisions, I still like it. :-) Interesting to see the Burma improvements. BTW Blofeld just got blocked. It's very easy to receive blocks. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kanmaw Kyun
Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Money Island
Hello, while I understand making a disambiguation page, the name Money Island, Long Island Sound is not descriptive enough. Could you please rename it to Money Island (Connecticut)? An example would be Peacock Island (Connecticut). Thanks. Markvs88 (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

NM Road 120
A major intersections list for this hotel per WP:MOS would include all intersections with other numbered highways, which is more than just one on this case. Once a history or RJL is added, then it can be a start class. --Admrboltz (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, its MOS:RJL --Admrboltz (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Indonesian villages
Are not by any means notable simply because they exist (ontological inherent notability would see literally tens of thousands of pointless stubs) - two examples: -
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koor,_Indonesia
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batuan,_Bali

neither article actually has any inherent notability - please note that this subject will be copied to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indonesia - thank you SatuSuro 04:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The reason things are brought up at the noticeboard of the project is not to jump to an example in question and ascertain the viability of sources at oggle - but the principle of where the issue of places stops - blofeld and I have had discussions on this in the past and really in the end there are different streams of thought within the wp community as to whether every bloody locality on the planet gets a hit in wikipedia therefore google - I think the looping and the issues are beyond any one locality - and really I have long moved away from getting involved in wp wide policies - just look at the time wasted that usually end up in the bureaucratic nightmares that some eds love so much to see their names at arbcom etc - nah - all I am trying to do is to ask that at the Indonesian project level - we do not name every damned village in the country - to me it smells of common sense SatuSuro 05:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

You make some very valid points, and very practical as well - I need to leave the computer, I appreciate your comments - it is a pity that I have little time to go into a long explanation - thanks for the comments - I do hope that I might get a chance to comment at length closer to the christmas/new year break time - I leave with what I wander what the, the following item actually does for the Indonesian project though http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdistricts_of_East_Java - cheers - have a safe christmas SatuSuro 05:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Koor, Indonesia is a notable settlement. I only started major villages. And is it so unreasonable to have 10 articles on places in Irian Jaya? I certainly don't think blindly starting every tiny village on the planet is the way to start. We should be working on the more major settlements first and larger villages, injecting some quality and gradually expanding. I'm not sure that Satusaro understands that I do have principals in regards to notability.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

If it is a notable settlement it is curious as to when they are created why stubs like that remain unworked? There is an issue of starting a stub and then leaving it - the Indonesian project has had in the past the drop a stub into the system and run - by non english speaking editors specially - and they never come back - and also no one ever cleans them up unless something like this occurs - to me 'dropping' potentially expandable stubs without adequate followup is close to nuisance editing in a project the size of Indonesia SatuSuro 12:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Conspiracy journalism (2nd nomination)
Because you participated in Articles for deletion/Conspiracy journalism, you may be interested in Articles for deletion/Conspiracy journalism (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Page move request - Rob Stone
Page move request for Rob Stone (businessman). Ample sources have been added to the work in progress. Mediaevent (talk) 15:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)