User talk:Bekiroflaz

Main Page redesign
The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, P retzels Talk! 09:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your post to X!
I saw your post to X! Just wanted to let you know that X! is on a wikibreak - the notice came after you posted, so you may not have seen it, but letting you know as you may not get a prompt response. -- SPhilbrick  T  14:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Svenja Huth
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Svenja Huth. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Svenja Huth


The article Svenja Huth has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DeVeDe


The article DeVeDe has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 21:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of KRename for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KRename is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KRename until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 02:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)