User talk:BelAirFinishing

Welcome!
Hello, BelAirFinishing, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:BelAirFinishing, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 14:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BelAirFinishing


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:BelAirFinishing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 14:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because Bel Air Finishing is a company comprised with manufacturing and engineering experts looking to provide technical articles to Wikipedia for frequently asked process-finishing questions to be answered. Currently, there are no Wikipedia articles regarding certain subject matter pertinent to precision finishing practices and machine process technology. Bel Air Finishing is only intending to submit technical articles to Wikipedia for educational use and application.
 * First of all, that "because" was completely unwarranted: that an article is promotional cannot be disproved by saying something about the subject. You should discuss the article. Second, it was incredibly promotional. Drmies (talk) 15:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The "article" was providing background knowledge about the user, indicating that they are a subject matter expert and have the credentials to submit technical articles in the desired fields. The user page description that was provided has no intention of promoting or advertising itself, it was used as complementary and supporting information for the articles that are intended on being posted in the future for manufactures and engineers. There are no articles containing any subject matter of post-process finishing or precision finish smoothing, and BAFS as a user is intending on submitting articles in this field to provide information regarding those topics. BelAirFinishing (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You can't be serious. "unique manufacturer and supplier", "experiencing the many obstacles that a company must hurdle to achieve first quality – yet cost effective – finishing of its components", "The company selects what is best for the customer and puts together an integrated turnkey system"--if you don't think that is promotional, you should not be writing for Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * These are characteristics that manufacturers and engineers alike value when evaluating information regarding certain finishing solutions and machining processes. If the user's credentials were not identified, the technical articles would not hold as much credibility with the audience, therefore the user's standards and expectations in the field were clearly outlined. BelAirFinishing (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Subject-matter experts are welcome on Wikipedia, but they are not exempt from our core content policies:
 * Verifiability: Statements made in an article must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Unpublished personal knowledge or experience is not allowed.
 * Reliable sources: Sources used must have an established reputation for fact-checking, editorial oversight, and in most cases, editorial independence from the subject matter.
 * Neutral point of view: Information must be worded objectively, imparting as little emotion as possible to the subject, positive or negative.
 * As well, experts have no additional powers or permissions on Wikipedia. All users are considered equal; no specialized knowledge or expertise is required to be able to edit a particular topic. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Drmies (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Your proposed username is way too close to the early one. As for minor edits, I have reverted a whole bunch of them already, since they were not improvements--many of them, for instance, changed British English into American English without explanation, inappropriately: Singapore-related articles, for instance, frequently use BE for historical reasons. The "additional intention" is written in the kind of promotional jargon that I don't understand. Drmies (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * What would be an appropriate username that is not too similar to the original? As mentioned, there are no technical articles containing information on post-process finishing, a field that this user is a subject matter expert in. The intention is to publish technical articles for educational use and application for engineers and manufacturers. BelAirFinishing (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know--your real name? A made-up name? Admins, please see the section above, where the user was arguing against deletion of their draft. Drmies (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)