User talk:Belair1

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Silberkraus.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:L fbbcd7b0a88b1cfbccc83309ec20f145.jpg. The copy called Image:L fbbcd7b0a88b1cfbccc83309ec20f145.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stephen Hayward Silberkraus
A tag has been placed on Stephen Hayward Silberkraus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zedla (talk) 07:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Stephen Hayward Silberkraus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Also, please do not delete the speedy delete template added to the article if you disagree. Please follow the instructions listed and provide a justification for the article not to be deleted. Thanks.-- Gmatsuda (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stephen Hayward Silberkraus
A tag has been placed on Stephen Hayward Silberkraus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Master of Puppets Care to share?  01:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Javascript in articles
I disabled your javascript that you put in the Stephen Hayward Silberkraus article as it was screwing up the page layout. I do not think it's the best idea to put javascript into an article, wiki syntax is much perferable. -- Nn123645 (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sense media group.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sense media group.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
-- Gmatsuda (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Stephen Hayward Silberkraus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please note that I will be watching for this article now since it is obvious that you're using Wikipedia as publicity for whoever this guy is. If you continue to remove the speedy delete template or if you add the article again after it is deleted without confirming the subject's notability (see above), I will report your behavior to Wikipedia admins as abuse. At that point, the article will be deleted and you will likely be prevented from editing.

The same goes for your other articles promoting your magazine and publishing company, SENSE Media Group, SENSE Magazine, Edward Gonzalez Jr. and Los Angeles Sports Journal. I have requested speedy delete for all of those articles as well for the same reason listed above. Please note that this isn't a personal thing. It's just that you are abusing Wikipedia for personal gain and that rubs a lot of people the wrong way. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 14:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Promotion on Wikipedia
Hello, the above user just about said it all but I will reiterate: Wikipedia is under no circumstance the place to promote yourself or any organizations you are involved with. I have deleted basically all of your contributions as spam/advertising. You are welcome to edit articles here that on subject that you have no involvement with, but contributions related to these magazines will be deleted. Thanks --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk  17:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC)