User talk:BelchingFox/Slow violence/Orangetruncate Peer Review

Peer Review Response
Thank you for the insightful feedback on my draft. I appreciate your suggestions for improvement and agree that merging the description and definition sections will make the lead more cohesive. I'll also work on reducing redundancy in the opening sentences.

Your idea to consolidate similar topics into broader categories for a more polished structure resonates with me, and I plan to reorganize the content accordingly. This should help in providing a clearer narrative and focusing on the main themes of Slow Violence.

I'll take a closer look at the tone in the opening paragraph to ensure it maintains neutrality, particularly regarding the theoretical perspectives on Slow Violence and Environmental Racism.

Your positive comments on the breadth of my research are encouraging, and I'm grateful for your constructive criticism. It's been very helpful, and I'm excited to refine my article based on your suggestions.

Thanks, MackBook2024 2601:1C0:4D81:1C40:255B:E509:78DD:A799 (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Orangetruncate !
 * You did a marvelously in-depth review– thanks so much! I have been trying to incorporate an increased number of required articles for the graduate requirements and had been continuing the sectionality that the original article had in my (very preliminary oops) drafts, but your recommendations for condensing gets at just what I was hoping to land on!! I'm glad to see that from your perspective, and I agree on those sections for sure. I will most definitely be incorporating your review in our future edits. Thanks again! Szelinsky (talk) 08:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks so much for your kind words!! i'm really loving how this Wikipedia approach to final papers enables more pure collaboration. It's also just nice to know that we aren't simply typing into a black hole! I imagine you are probably busy like me, but I did write my first draft for my own article and submit it last week. Not sure if you saw it, but if you have any quick thoughts they would be dearly appreciated. no pressure, though - Definitely don't want to add to your workload because of my own schedule issues. 71.238.121.158 (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks so much for your kind words!! i'm really loving how this Wikipedia approach to final papers enables more pure collaboration. It's also just nice to know that we aren't simply typing into a black hole! I imagine you are probably busy like me, but I did write my first draft for my own article and submit it last week. Not sure if you saw it, but if you have any quick thoughts they would be dearly appreciated. no pressure, though - Definitely don't want to add to your workload because of my own schedule issues. 71.238.121.158 (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * peer collaboration
 * 71.238.121.158 (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I am not very good at navigating this platform yet, but I agree about the collaboration despite schedule (and tech-savviness) barriers! It looks like you have completed some solid work, apologies that I couldn't have added more valuable feedback. Best of luck! Szelinsky (talk) 04:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)