User talk:Belezbub

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tomás Mac Curtain, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 18:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stephen McKeag—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Edits
It seems you are not here to improve Wikipedia, or engage in collaborative editing with other users. Given that ever single edit you've made on Wikipedia appears to have been reverted it seems that you are instead here to right great wrongs and put a spin on topics related to Northern Ireland and The Troubles. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia is not here to promote one side in The Troubles, to downplay another or to right these great wrongs. Your edits to this point have been singularly disruptive and not made to improve the encyclopaedia, but instead to promote a perspective and point of view. I encourage you to prove otherwise, but at this point unfortunately it seems your editing pattern is just leading you directly to a block. Please read and abide by the following policies and guidelines. WP:NPOV, WP:IMOS. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 12:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Www.giantscauseway.tours


A tag has been placed on Www.giantscauseway.tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mccapra (talk) 11:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Www.giantscauseway.tours


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Www.giantscauseway.tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 11:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)