User talk:Belgesellik45

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Justice Forever for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 20:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied in the related page.Belgesellik45 (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Where will I make Unblock Request? In User PAge or Discussion?

Tacid Acknowledgments?: User:JamesBWatson)


 * "I have spent A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF TIME looking at EDITING HISTORIES, and there is no doubt whatsoever that this is a sockpuppet account of several other accounts that have been blocked as sockpuppets of Justice Forever. WHETHER IT IS ALSO A SOCKPUPPET OF JUSTICE FOREVER I NEITHER KNOW NOR CARE: it is a sockpuppet account of somebody.".
 * = Though I spent lots of time, It is impossible for me to prove you are a socpuppet of Justice Forever.

THE TALE OF WOLF AND LAMB:

Wolf (to Lamb): "You are making my water dirty"

Lamb (to Wolf): "How can it be? You are in the upper part of the river, I am in the lower part."

Wolf (to Lamb): "I do not care wherever you are. I WILL EAT YOU" (I do not care wherever you are = WHETHER IT IS ALSO A SOCKPUPPET OF JUSTICE FOREVER I NEITHER KNOW NOR CARE)

THERE IS NO SIMILARITY AND EDITING STYLE ARE 100% DIFFERENT AS I PROVED ABOVE. I GAVE CONCRETE PROOF. CONTINUATION OF BLOCKING WAS REALIZED UPON TACIT ASSUMPTIONS!

I'm sorry; I didn't realize that you don't understand the word 'tacit.' I'll rephrase. You have made it clear that you are breaking Wikipedia's rule by using more than one account. No one is going to unblock you just because you say that you aren't using 'Justice Forever.' You would only be unblocked if someone was convinced that you are not using any other accounts, which is pretty obviously not true. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I did not break Wikipedia's rule (using more than one account). Rather, I proved I am completely different than the claimed sockpuppet.

On the other hand, you are right: some wiki admin must be convinced so that I am not using any other accounts for my being unblocked. That is why I am trying to do. The first time, I presented a clear proof by reading the guidelines (I am suggested to show the DIFFERENCE OF EDITING HABITS). I showed with 100% clearance. What else (what other ways) should I do (as well as showing the difference of editing habits)? Please Help. Any further suggestions/guidelines will be welcomed. Salutely Belgesellik45 (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Let us make two points clear.
 * 1) This account is blocked because it is a sockpuppet account. It is clearly and unambiguously a sockpuppet of a user who has had other accounts blocked for sockpuppetry. I have established that fact by a long and painstaking comparison of the edits of this account and those of the other accounts in question, and the evidence is persuasive beyond all reasonable doubt. Those other accounts, and this one, have been stated to be sockpuppets of Justice Forever. Since I had established that this account is a sockpuppet, it was not necessary to establish whether the attribution to Justice Forever was correct or not, so, having already spent a lot of time investigating this, I didn't waste time doing so. I did not say that I could not do so, and your claim that I said that is putting words into my mouth. In any case, whether I could or could not do so if I were to try is irrelevant, as this account is a sockpuppet account, and is blocked for that reason.
 * 2) You have made several unblock requests which essentially repeat the same things, and bring in no new reasons. If you do so again your talk page access will be revoked, if the reviewing administrator for your current request doesn't do so this time. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * User:JamesBWatson), thanks for your explanations. Please, do not misunderstand me. I did not accuse you of anything bad. I followed the guidelines. The first suggestion was the showing of editing styles. You may be right, there can be some similarities between me and some other Wiki users. Since I am not given to which Wikiuser I am similar to, I have no capacity to claim otherwise.

I pledge with my full sincerence to the followings:


 * 1. I guarantee all Wikipedia fora that I will stick to my username.


 * 2. I guarantee all Wikipedia fora that I will not request any other unblock further.


 * 3. I apologize to all Wiki users if I disturbed in any subject.


 * 4. If I am misunderstood by edits in any page, thereby disturb any user (if any, disturbed), I apologize again. (if I have been comprehended badly upon the above Wolf/Lamb tale, then I apologize from User:JamesBWatson personally in my full sincerence). I wrote it to get help so that my situation does not imitate the tale. So, dear User:JamesBWatson), I am open to everybody's suggestions that will make my requests essentially not repeat the same things.Belgesellik45 (talk) 12:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)