User talk:Belimemusic

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Belimemusic) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Belime. Thank you. Mtking (talk) 02:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello Belimemusic. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Belime, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 06:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC) Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Jafeluv (talk) 07:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

deletion
Thanks for email. You are of course exactly the wrong person to write a neutral encyclopaedia article about him. The article did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. Aside from the unestablished notability, the article is full of unsourced spammy claims, eg a commercial success, the hit "This Is Reality", showcased his musical potential, immediately saw the talent, most luxurious clubs etd  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I looked at Ragheb Alama, I don't know how that missed deletion, full of unsourced spam, no proper references. It's survived too long for a speedy, so I've cleaned up the worst of the spam/unsourced claims. Belimer is not a proper source in the terms of Wikipedia, since he is not an independent source, nor can what you claim he says easily be verified by us. Belimer may be notable, but an encyclopaedia article is different in style from a press release. Keep it neutral, reference what you claim to proper sources (yes,Time Out is OK), preferably in-line, include negative reviews. There is nothing to stop recreation, although obviously I'll watch with interest  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)