User talk:Belisarius~skwiki

Cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Terezia Páleníková a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Terézia Páleníková. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
 smileguy91  talk x my huckleberrying  22:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recognition of same-sex unions in Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page For the People ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Slovakia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Slovakia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catch-all ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_political_parties_in_Slovakia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_political_parties_in_Slovakia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Ijeoma Oluo have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''For the third time you have posted defamatory criticism at Ijeoma Oluo citing a attack essay by a far-right extremist, Rod Dreher as a source. The opinions of a person's political enemies do not constitute reliable sources. Other editors have reverted this in the past and you have made no effort to discuss it at the article's talk page. The WP:BLP policy places a heavy burden of evidence on any negative information about a living person and requires great care. If you continue to add negative content about a living person without exercising care, and seeking the consensus of other editors to ensure the the policy is adhered to, you may be blocked from editing.Your edit summaries say you think your edits are being censored because of your ideology, which suggests a failure to read and understand the WP:BLP policy. If you do not understand the policy, and don't make an effort to work with other editors to understand it, you cannot be allowed to edit articles about living people.'' Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Dennis, mislabelling someone as "far-right extremist" is advantageous to someone if he/she wants to discredite the person and to diminish the possibility of ideas of that person to be present in the society, however, it is wrong as it is very easy to be misused. Because of her opinions, I can easily name Iljeoma Oluo as "far-left extremist" and through this easy step, which might be just my point of view (even with Master in Political Science), can afterwards easily discredit that person of using her ideas as "political enemies". As far as I know, none of them (Dreher and Oluo) are active politicians, thus they of course cannot be political enemies. They are two writers with having different opinions about some issues. Accustomed with WP BLP, I still consider this part of article about Oluo as relevant. I consider this information about views of Oluo by Dreher as normal information, not "negative content", it is cited. I hope that after the explanation of this issue you understand the point. Wikipedia should be project for all points of views, not just the ones I or you or someone else likes of prefers. For example, even in the article about Dreher, there is sentence about Leonard Harris calling Dreher "white nationalist". Even about this information, again it is just the opinion of someone else, as you might say "political enemy", and Im not trying to delete this information, as Mr Harris has right to say anything about Dreher as well as Dreher has about Oluo and so on, and so forth. Otherwise Wikipedia will be just an ideological project, where democratic opinions of some people are tolerated and some not. Best regards.--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It doesn't sound like you actually went and read WP:Biographies of living persons. I strongly encourage you to do so, and to discuss the policy in an appropriate venue to ensure you understand how the BLP policy is applied. If you don't show any evidence of making a minimal effort to understand the BLP policy, you shouldn't expect a lot of tolerance for you banging around biography articles trying to feel your way towards understanding it. Wikipedia's policy is to strictly remove potentially damaging material about living people, not keep it around and see how it shakes out, which is essentially what the WP:Editing policy says we can do with content not about living people.Please stop edit warring on biographies of living persons. Go to the article's talk page and do not proceed until you have consensus from other editors. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * There is one saying in Slovak language, "Jak keby hrach na stenu hádzal". As I told you, I have read the WP BLP. The information I try to correct is relevant and neutral, both with Iljeoma Oluo and with Margot (activist). Still some people are trying to destroy the very same principles they speak about and start edit warrings, trying to delete either evalutation of Oluo's opinions or, what is absolutely shocking, the legal reality of name, as it is in case of Margot (activist). I'm disappointed that some users of English wikipedia the very essence of academic research and try to censor even the reliable sources of information just because they do not like it. If I would do the same, we would be stuck in neverending edit war (even if data in those cases are supporting my point of view). However, I do not plan to waste my time and energy with warring. I am glad that Slovak Wikipedia is not that biased as English one and we do not have to deal with such problems. Good luck with your further work Dennis, and I recommend you to open your eyes and adhere to reality. Best regards,--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Deadnaming and misgendering a living person for no good reason is simple harassment, not encyclopedia building. You have never posted at Talk:Margot (activist) and that suggests a lack of good faith and an unwillingness to collaborate. I do hope you truly are flouncing off in a huff, never to return, or if you do return, it's with different motives. If you make any more edits that appear to be intended to harm the subject of an article, I'll request to have you indefinitely blocked from editing. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Dear Dennis, I have never encountered a user like you at Wikipedia. Unfortunately, your arrogant and unprofessional style of discussion and using ideology of "deadnaming" and "misgendering" instead of real factography only shows your own inappropriateness as a Wikipedia user. The reality cannot harm anyone, Wikipedia is not a parent who tries to lie to its child that Santa gives the presents to not harm the child. If I again see the contentious issue where facts are bent, I will again join to bring real facts. If you try to block me from editing just because you do not like the reality of facts, then I will have no other option than to request to block you indefinitely for your damaging activity at Wikipedia. Best regards--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 19:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Your edits just today have been reverted by three other editors besides me. No other editors have expressed any support for your edits. You have made no effort to collaborate with any of them. Telling yourself that you've never encountered anyone like me is not going to help. You have encountered nothing but editors who don't agree with your edits, and have not engaged respectfully with even one of them. You will not be successful in editing a collaborative encyclopedia if you make no effort to collaborate. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Margot
Hello. Your edits to Margot (activist) have been reverted by me and other editors. Wikipedia describes somebody's gender according to that person's preferences. It's not the same as Hitler describing himself as a pacifist, lefty, or whatever. This policy ONLY relates to gender. The talk page goes into this in depth, so please read it before making more edits regarding this issue. Many thanks. Malick78 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Malick, I went through the talk page before and I have seen that no rational argumentation of other users did suceed before with this issue. I still strongly oppose unscientific prioritizing of personal own feelings over the biological and legal reality. As you have seen, I did not change the he/she pronouns in the text. I only assume that legally he is a man named Michal Szutowicz, he did not changed his sex/gender from male to female, neither did he change his name from Michal to Malgorzata. It is erroneus to prioritise any fluctuating personal statements when there is real evidence about these characteristics of person that opposes the feelings. Wikipedia should bring real knowledge, this approach is absurd and goes totally against the scientific purpose of description of the world. Tomorrow he can decide that he is a man again, next week he might be a dolphin named Rudolph, and so on. By that time, de iure he still will be a man Michal Szutowicz and this should be definitely included in the very first sentence of the article, as it is his real name and real sex/gender. As soon as he undergoes the needed surgery or legally changes his gender to female and legally changes his name, then it will be ok to include female Malgorzata into the first sentence. All these information about his current personal feelings of self-identification should be included in the article as well, but not in the heading. Heading should be brief and accurate and should not misinform. If you will follow the heading and look for some Malgorzata Szutowicz, you won't find any, as there is no one with such a name (who would correspond to activist Margot) living in Poland, just ask the authorities. Thus, I see no point currently in edit warring, the only solution that makes sense is to change this absurd Wikipedia rules. I will campaign for it firstly in our national level, then globally. I hope that now you understand the reasons of my actions. I will include this talk to Margot talk, too. Best regards--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 05:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia (May 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christian_Democratic_Youth_of_Slovakia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Devonian_Wombat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christian_Democratic_Youth_of_Slovakia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia has been accepted
 Christian Democratic Youth of Slovakia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Christian_Democratic_Youth_of_Slovakia help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Beccaynr (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I’ll wear my uninvolved administrator hat and speak plainly. Another edit like those two and your editing privileges on this Wikipedia will be permanently revoked. Had you already been alerted, they already would be. This is a long term problem, given you made similarly problematic edits back in 2020.  Therefore, acting in my administrative capacity, this is a logged, formal warning under Contentious topics for misconduct in the topic under sanctions from the GENSEX case.  This warning will be placed in the WP:AELOG. It may be appealed at. WP:AE. Further similar edits may see you blocked or topic banned without further warning. Courcelles (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Courcelles, can you please explain why do you consider my behaviour in any sense as problematic? Thank you for the explanation.--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * . DEADNAME, accusing others of totalitarianism? Honestly that diff would have had you indefinitely blocked had you previously been aware of CTOPS. Courcelles (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Courcelles, born and raised in Slovakia, studied at the universities in Slovakia, Czechia and Germany, Ive always esteemed highly the access to free and true information, as we in Central Europe do know very well how the regimes have altered the reality in the past. Thus, I was really surprised that it was a problem that my critique of some setting of English Wiki was seemed as inappropriate, as I think there should always be a free discussion possibility. English is my third language, therefore those juridical formulations not present in Slovak law are complicated to understand for me. Anyway, I will respect your Admin opinion and I will not alter articles about this topics at English wiki as I want to continue to actively contribute to other areas of my interest. All the best.--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 21:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Am I right in understanding that you intend to edit in a similar manner in other languages on the other Wikipedia sites? DanielRigal (talk) 21:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello DanielRigal, as a Wikipedian, by all my edits I always strive for editing in neutral point of view, based on the reliable sources. Have a nice day.--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please answer the question. Do you intend to edit the other language Wikipedias in a similar manner to the way in which you have been told is not allowed on English Wikipedia? DanielRigal (talk) 08:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)