User talk:Bella64

Repost of Future World Music
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 02:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Future World Music competitors Immediate Music, X Ray Dog, Two Steps From Hell, Groove Addicts have the same type of page and have not been deleted. I don't understand why this page is being targeted and not theirs. Please explain.

This article needs to be taken to Deletion review - follow the instructions there on the "how to", which is about 1/3 of the way down the page. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

And you're on the way to being blocked for making legal threats. Please read both of these links (deletion review & legal threats) before you continue editing. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you give me an answer instead of challenging me? We have every right to post harmless information as our competitors have done. Can you at least let me know why we are being singled out? This seems very petty and frivolous. I'm standing up for my rights to post info on your website just as Immediate Music, Groove Addicts and X Ray Dog have. Why aren't those pages deleted?

Furthermore, I didn't make any legal threats. I think this discussion is very good evidence of unwarranted hostility by you, an administrator. Our page contains all the requirements by Wikipedia. So, please again explain why we are being singled out from our competitors who have identical pages and some have no references at all.

Aug 12th, 2009 - Will someone please follow up? I am only trying to resolve this issue, so that the page isn't deleted. As I've stated earlier, our competitors Immediate Music, Groove Addicts and X Ray Dog have exact same pages and even reference Future World Music on their Wikipedia page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.162.13 (talk) 18:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * On review of the article, it is a substantial recreation of the page deleted at Articles for deletion/Future World Music. As I noted on Talk:Future World Music, other stuff exists. The fact that those companies have articles has no direct bearing on whether Future World Music does/should have one.


 * IMO, an article about Future World Music will be sufficiently different from the prior version if it relies strongly on independent reliable sources. Show where the company has received substantial coverage in newspapers, magazines, etc.


 * Finally, based on your usage of the words "we" and "our competitors," I suggest you review the conflict of interest guidelines. While your connection to the subject does not forbid you to write about it, it does place a burden on you to show that independent sources have documented the claims you are making about the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 02:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * One more thing: you did make what appears to be a legal threat. However, I will construe your "I didn't make any legal threats" comment above as a retraction of the comment in question. Wikipedia takes legal threats very seriously; they are one of the few behaviours that will result in an account being blocked with little or no warning. —C.Fred (talk) 02:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Then why are these pages acceptable? Immediate Music, X Ray Dog, Groove Addicts, Two Steps From Hell Can you understand how unfair this is considering these pages are allowed to have the exact type of page? I'll ask again and please answer. Why is Future World Music targeted and not the pages listed above?

Furthermore, if those pages remain on Wikipedia without deletion, I will seek legal action. That's not a threat; it's harsh reality. When someone's rights are violated, in this case, and there is no other means of resolution and none offered, one must seek legal action. Everything happens for a reason. It seems like the bully tactics and power trips that you and your fellow administrators are abusing must come to an end.

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at  and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You people are so insignificant. With all that is going on in the world, you actually think what you do on this site is remotely important. I will be contacting the corporate headquarters in San Francisco and inform them how disgusting you administrators are in your pathetic little lives.

Furthermore, you have the power to block people from this site just because your little feelings get hurt; but you will all be losers for the rest of your lives.