User talk:Bellemare

License tagging for Image:Jackie Clarkson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jackie Clarkson.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Junior Rodriguez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Junior Rodriguez.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Renee Gill Pratt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Renee Gill Pratt.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion warning
A tag has been placed on Jay Batt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Jay Batt is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Jay Batt. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. MER-C 02:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Jay Batt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jay Batt.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome, some tips
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers, -- Infrogmation 02:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

License tagging for Image:Benny Rousselle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Benny Rousselle.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kathleen Blanco.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kathleen Blanco.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Arthur and Cynthia Morrell and grandchildren.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arthur and Cynthia Morrell and grandchildren.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kathleen Blanco.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kathleen Blanco.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok  ☠  22:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Linking
Please let me add my welcome and thank you for contributions, especially to the Action democratique du Quebec article. It would be a good idea for you to review the Wikipedia Manual of Style on links. In particular, the section on overlinking says:
 * "do not make too many links. An article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true:

Thanks again. Ground Zero | t 11:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More than 10% of the words are contained in links;
 * More than 10% of the links are to articles that don't exist; or
 * Low added-value items are linked without reason — such as, 1995, 1980s, and 20th century.
 * A link for any single term is excessively repeated in the same article."

Linking acronyms
If you click on MNA, you will see what this links to. It is not a very useful page for readers. It would be more helpful to readers to link like this: MNA. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 01:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've just checked my own linking. It turns out that Member of the National Assembly is redirected to MNA, which is a disambiguation page that leads back to National Assembly of Quebec. So either we should be linking like this: MNA, or not link at all if National Assembly of Quebec has already been linked. Ground Zero | t 11:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Cut and paste move
Please don't do cut and paste moves as you did from to. It loses the page history and violates the GFDL. The proper procedure would have been: Move "Curtis Cooper" to "Curtis Cooper (mathematician)" (it should be lower m but you don't have to fix that now), and then edit the resulting redirect at "Curtis Cooper" to make, in this case, a disambiguation page. See Help:Moving a page and How to fix cut and paste moves. You can request a fix at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. PrimeHunter 15:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I posted to Cut and paste move repair holding pen and it has been fixed. PrimeHunter 02:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Trois-Rivières
The undifferentiated title Trois-Rivières is currently a disambiguation page, not an article about the city in Quebec. Please be aware that you need to link specifically to Trois-Rivières, Quebec when referring to the city. Thanks. Bearcat 00:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Senatorial Division of Shawinegan
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Senatorial Division of Shawinegan, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: :. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 12:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Boucher (musician)
A template has been added to the article Daniel Boucher (musician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Edward Emerson Barnard
Re your category edit to this article: Astronomer E.E. Barnard, a Canadian politician? Are you sure you have the right Edward Emerson Barnard? -- Cuppysfriend 17:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Sonny Dixon
Hi, actually the page was deleted by a user, Fantasy. The user who edited the article, Sonnygator, is probably Sonny Dixon, but the reason for deletion is complex. Fantasy is a member of OTRS meaning she can read and take action based on the emails to Wikipedia. The reason she deleted Sonny Dixon was refered to as an OTRS action (see the deletion log). This may mean that Sonny Dixon himself emailed Wikipedia and requested less personal information in the article, though I'm not sure. I have emailed Fantasy asking for clarification but it might not be possible to get a reason because of privacy issues. Please refrain from editing the article until the matter is cleared up because there might be some legal reason for the article being deleted. Thanks for your time, I'll inform you when I get a reply from Fantasy. James086 Talk &#124; Email 00:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, it's me again. I haven't received an email from yet so I checked to see if she was active. She hasn't made any contributions since August 9 and Sonny Dixon was one of the last actions she took. Her userpage suggests that she probably won't be able to edit due to her house being constructed so perhaps it will be some time until I get a reply. None-the-less, I will contact you when she replies. Thanks,  James086 Talk &#124;  Email 13:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Bellemare,
 * The page started with his age, religion, the name of his wife, the number of children, the college he attendet (without references for this information), so for me this was clearly something that should not be in Wikipedia. He must be really really important so that information like this has to show up in Wikipedia. Currently I think no (especially in view of no resource mentioned).
 * I leave it up to  James086  to decide if he wants to get back relevant and well referenced sections that may be used again. Please try to be as strict and precise and NEUTRAL as possible when writing about a person, then I think it should be ok. Fantasy 22:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, I re-added some information that had sources. The article must be sourced carefully because it's a biography of a living person. As Fantasy suggested, it's probably a good idea to leave out personal details, even if they are sourced. Thanks for your patience, James086 Talk &#124;  Email 23:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Owens-Thomas House and other GA and LA National Historic Landmarks
Hi Bellemare -- I included your article on Owens-Thomas House into a List of National Historic Landmarks in Georgia, an article under development to cover the 47 NHLs in GA. I was happy to find your article already created, and nicely written. I just added that the site is a National Historic Landmark to the article, and added other stuff including a reference link to a very rich text source for more information. It would be great if you could revisit it and edit in more information based on that additional source. Also, please feel free to contribute to the Georgia list of NHLs or articles covered by it, and check out List of National Historic Landmarks in Louisiana, too. Keep up the good work! Please feel free to ask me any questions on my talk page about NHL and NRHP research sources for landmarks, too. doncram 20:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jackie Clarkson.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jackie Clarkson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Fernand Therese.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fernand Therese.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Junior Rodriguez.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Junior Rodriguez.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Maurice Richard
Hi, Bellemare!

Could you clarify the second reference on Maurice Richard (Quebec politician)? Is that from a book? Or was it a newspaper article? I couldn't find anything on Google that matched. Many thanks for your help!! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 07:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Piped links
Thanks for all of your great contributions to Quebec articles. Please note piped link:
 * Keep piped links as intuitive as possible. Do not use piped links to create "easter egg links", that require the reader to follow them before understanding what's going on. Also remember there are people who print the articles. For example, do not write this:
 * ...and by mid-century the puns and sexual humor were (with only a few exceptions) back in to stay.
 * The readers will not see the hidden reference to Thomas Bowdler unless they click or hover over the piped exceptions link — in a print version, there is no link to select, and the reference is lost. Instead, reference the article explicitly:
 * ...and by mid-century the puns and sexual humor were (with only a few exceptions; see Thomas Bowdler) back in to stay.
 * Similarly:
 * "After an earlier disaster (see Bombay Explosion (1944))", not "After an earlier disaster..."

So linking an election article and then piping only the year doesn't help the reader know what to expect. Adding "election" or "Quebec election" into the pipe will clarify to the reader what the link will take them to. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 18:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for your great contributions. Ground Zero | t 13:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

LAStatewideOfficials
I merged my template over yours instead of creating a new one. I also renamed it LAStatewideOfficials. Let me know if you want to unmerge.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Headings
The Wikipedia style for headings is to use "sentence case", not "title case", i.e., words that are not proper nouns are not capitalized (other than the first word in the heading). See WP:MSH. Thanks, and keep up the great work. Ground Zero | t 16:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Trudel (Cité de l'Énergie)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert Trudel (Cité de l'Énergie), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Georgia Statewide Executive Officials
Have you thought of converting Template:Georgia Statewide Executive Officials into a template like Category:United States statewide political official templates?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

J.A. Bilodeau
Bonjour,

Tout d'abord, félicitations pour les nombreux articles que tu as initiés en rapport avec la Mauricie. C'est très intéressant. Cela dit, je te propose une petite correction au sujet du titre de l'article sur J.A. Bilodeau. Fabien Larochelle avait affublé cette personne du prénom Arthur dans son livre de 1976 (Shawinigan depuis 75 ans), mais après plus de recherches il a ensuite fait une rectification, dans son livre de 1988 (Histoires de Shawinigan), en précisant que cela avait été une erreur qui s'était glissée dans son livre de 1976. Dans sa rectification de 1988, Larochelle écrit qu'il n'a pas réussi à élucider la signification du "A" (à supposer qu'il ait une signification), mais il est à peu près certain que cela n'a rien à voir avec le prénom Arthur. Il serait donc sûrement préférable de modifier le titre de l'article, soit en utilisant les prénoms de baptême (Joseph Jean Bilodeau), soit en utilisant les initiales J.A. Bilodeau sous lesquelles la personne semble avoir été connue. C'est cette deuxième solution qu'a utilisée la Société d'histoire de Shawinigan (lien mentionné en référence dans l'article). Je ne sais pas trop laquelle de ces deux solutions est la meilleure pour l'article de Wikipedia. Je te refile le problème :) en laissant cela à ton jugement. Cordialement,  -- Asclepias (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Bon, je l'ai renommé J.A. Bilodeau, suivant l'exemple de la Société d'histoire. J'ai hésité sur la possibilité de mettre un trait d'union ou non, mais bon.  -- Asclepias (talk) 19:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Pipkin Ave Railroad Crossing.jpg
You seem to have forgotten to add a copyright tag to File:Pipkin Ave Railroad Crossing.jpg, one of several image you uploaded recently. Please remember to add one and you can remove the deletion notice when you do that. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Bellemare! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Yvon Lamarre -

Speedy deletion nomination of André Lamy
A tag has been placed on André Lamy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Éveline Gélinas


The article Éveline Gélinas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced BLP, fails WP:ARTIST

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 11:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Boucher (politician)


The article Daniel Boucher (politician) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet notability standards for politicians. No evidence of coverage outside of local area.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  PK T (alk)  13:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sonny Dixon Interchange


The article Sonny Dixon Interchange has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable interchange

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dough 48  72  02:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jimmy DeLoach Parkway


The article Jimmy DeLoach Parkway has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable road named for non-notable mayor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Fredddie™ 03:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coalition Avenir Québec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Dubé (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Roadside Welcome Sign.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roadside Welcome Sign.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lisa Landry


The article Lisa Landry has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   07:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jimmy DeLoach Parkway for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy DeLoach Parkway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jimmy DeLoach Parkway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 21:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Réjean Gaudreault for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Réjean Gaudreault is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Réjean Gaudreault until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rassemblement pour l'action municipale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rassemblement pour l'action municipale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rassemblement pour l'action municipale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with File:Raymond Lord, Mayor 1960-61.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Raymond Lord, Mayor 1960-61.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work contained within this image, you will need to specify


 * 1) the creator of the original work
 * 2) the copyright status of the original work, usually indicated by adding a licensing tag. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with File:Armand Lemay, Mayor 1974-75.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Armand Lemay, Mayor 1974-75.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work contained within this image, you will need to specify


 * 1) the creator of the original work
 * 2) the copyright status of the original work, usually indicated by adding a licensing tag. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with File:Armand Mercier, Mayor 2004-05.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Armand Mercier, Mayor 2004-05.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work contained within this image, you will need to specify


 * 1) the creator of the original work
 * 2) the copyright status of the original work, usually indicated by adding a licensing tag. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rita Mercier - Mayor 2002-03.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rita Mercier - Mayor 2002-03.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work contained within this image, you will need to specify


 * 1) the creator of the original work
 * 2) the copyright status of the original work, usually indicated by adding a licensing tag. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Georgia Statewide Executive Officials
Template:Georgia Statewide Executive Officials has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:55, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Savannah Gas Company Globe


The article Savannah Gas Company Globe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A minor oddity that seems to only have local notability. The only non-local reliable source that I could find was a brief entry in the tourist guide 'Secret Savannah: A Guide to the Weird, Wonderful, and Obscure'. All other coverage appears to be local, or only establishes that WP:ITEXISTS without giving an indication of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 20:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dorothy Barnes Pelote Bridge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorothy Barnes Pelote Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dorothy Barnes Pelote Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 22:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)