User talk:Bellis24/Deaf education/Plloren Peer Review

Thank you for your feedbacks and it is worth considering. Our group shared the connection with wanting to improve the worldview of Deaf Education by adding more sections from around the world. Deaf Education is commonly limited to western society, which is mainly USA and Europe in which I actually know about Deaf Education itself. This serves a good opportunity for us to be more inclusive of other parts of the world and recognize their contribution to Deaf Education. I do support your comment about going back to the start of the article and evaluate everything again and it is something I will look upon. I definitely agree about your suggestion on the lead section since I just reread it again. It is important to add about language modality to give the readers an insight rather than saving it off later in the article. I personally will feel satisfied if we all are able to contribute a large section rather than focusing on making minor edits.

Thank you for the peer review! I definitely understand your point about adding a section on language modality. There is a lot about the history of deaf education that is not included in this article and should be. Your points about wording, such as the use of the word "regular", is definitely something we need to change in the article. It's difficult to remember we have to be neutral to ALL perspectives, and there isn't one "regular" representation of English. I'm glad you agree about us adding more sections on worldwide education. This article does need a lot of work and there isn't a lot of time for us to make every change, but hopefully we can get a satisfactory amount done and fix all of your suggestions. Thanks again! Beebedell (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Brooke