User talk:Bellminsterboy

Welcome Bellminsterboy! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are users!

Hello, Bellminsterboy. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Thryduulf, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own private sandbox] for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

 Sincerely, Thryduulf (talk) 19:30, 20 July 2013 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thryduulf&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Dorchester South railway station
I see you have inserted the latest 12/13 usage figures. Are these figures correct and what is their source? The station seems busier than ever, yet the figures do not bear this out. Best regards, David J Johnson (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Jack, Thanks so much for the ref, which I completely missed - think I should lay down in a darkened room. I still find these figures odd and the explanation given in the data questionable, but who are we to argue? Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 16:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613973445 your edit] to List of largest church buildings in the world may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Andalucia, Southern Spain |publisher=Andalucia.com |date= |accessdate=2012-09-05}} ||  500,000 || Seville Cathedral || 1520 || Seville || Spain || Catholic ([[Roman
 * || || Winchester Cathedral || 1525 || Winchester, Hampshire  || United Kingdom  ||  Church of England (Anglican) || The longest Gothic Cathedral in Europe.

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited River Stour, Dorset, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mere. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Refresh URL
When adding sourcing for tropical cyclone intensities listed by the NHC, please, please, PLEASE do not use the links that are updated at every advisory (i.e. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MIATCPAT1+shtml/081453.shtml) Go into the storm archive and choose the advisory you want to cite. I've had to deal with this problem a lot since I've joined the project and I would really appreciate if you would help me out here. Thanks!ChessEric (talk · contribs) 16:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi ChessEric, thank you for bringing this to my attention; I didn't realise the links are updated at every advisory, I had thought they'd used new ones and will bear this in mind in the future. If I see someone else do it I'll point them in the right direction. Thank you! Bellminsterboy (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your welcome! Glad I could help!ChessEric (talk · contribs) 16:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi again ChessEric, I've updated the article lead for Delta using a reference from the storm's archive as requested, are you willing to let me know if I've done it right? Certainly never meant to cause problems for you :-) Bellminsterboy (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Good job! Keep up the good work!ChessEric (talk · contribs) 00:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rotherham Minster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Saints. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Inveraray Bell Tower
Hello, Bellminsterboy,

Thank you for creating Inveraray Bell Tower.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Nice work! If possible, make sure that the page is wikilinked from other pages so people can access it without searching."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Giraffer (talk·contribs) 08:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Locusts (2005 television film)


The article Locusts (2005 television film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Film appears to fail WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  16:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Rotherham Minster
Hi Bellminsterboy, as your reverting my photo on the minster page. if my photo is underexposed why not look for another suitable photo then one then one thats already used elsewhere for Rotherham? I'd choose one but don't want WP:EDITWARRING going on DragonofBatley (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Why does it matter if it's already used? Believe me, I have looked, and am happy to continue doing so. But there is nothing wrong with making an article the very best that it can be, and photos come into that - if there's a photo that is better than the one being used, irrespective of if it's already used somewhere else in Wikipedia, it should be used. I'm happy to take suggestions too as to what photo to put there.11:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Bellminsterboy (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Mary-le-Bow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EC2.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Mary-le-Bow
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article St Mary-le-Bow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Mary-le-Bow
The article St Mary-le-Bow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:St Mary-le-Bow and Talk:St Mary-le-Bow/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, I notice that you have not attempted to address the comments left for you when I produced the review of this article. I will be failing the GAN tomorrow, unless the comments are addressed. Amitchell125 (talk) 10:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Mary-le-Bow
The article St Mary-le-Bow you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:St Mary-le-Bow for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)