User talk:Belobogist

Welcome!
Hello, Belobogist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zujua (talk) 10:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

August 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Belobogism, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

The Book of Belobogism and Pierwodnica
I have added these two articles to the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Belobogism. Your comments are welcome there: for advice on how to contribute to these discussions, see WP:AFDEQ.

After seven days an uninvolved administrator will decide what to do on the basis, not of a count of heads, but on the arguments presented in terms of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Relevant ones include:
 * Verifiability
 * Notability
 * No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery. "
 * Reliable sources
 * Conflict of interest

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)