User talk:Belovedfreak/Archive 10

DYK nomination of Med Hondo
Hello! Your submission of Med Hondo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Czech Out  ☎ |  ✍  17:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Ecology of Africa
I have nominated ecology of africa for merging into Category:Natural history of Africa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Jose Garces
Hi. Did you have a particular reason for replacing my primarysources tag with "BLPunreferenced"? I find "primarysources" (which is badly named, should really be "need-more-than-primary-sources") useful because with plain "unref" they tend to add their own website, Myspace etc. and think that's enough. The primarysources template includes the useful message: "Primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article." I was thinking of taking this one to AfD, because "owns some restaurants and will be a contestant on a reality show" didn't sound like notability, but a quick look suggests that refs may be available. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry, didn't mean to step on your toes as such. I added the BLPunreferenced tag just because I think it's important to draw attention to the WP:BLP policy. The primary sources tag, I would usually use for when an article is relying on a primary source. In this case there was none. I wouldn't have bothered removing it however, but after I had added a couple of tags, I just thought it looked a but too cluttered, which I know can be a bit offputting to new editors. So, It's not a case of "my tag's better than yours" or anything! Just a different approach I guess. -- Beloved Freak  19:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, and no offence taken - as I said, I find that "unref" or "BLPunref" tends to produce the subject's own website and Myspace, and then adding "primarysources" later seems a bit like nagging. As you say, different approaches. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Advertising
Hey I'm new here sorry if Im doing this wrong, but can people use their personal page to advetise like this guy is doing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_L._Palminteri —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.207.197 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 22 September 2009
 * It looks like that userpage has been deleted now. Editors are not really encouraged to advertise themselves or their companies (see What Wikipedia is not and User page). There is some leeway for editors who contribute to the encyclopaedia to write about themselves on their userpage. It looks as though that particular page was created as an article and deleted because a lack of notability and references. It is acceptable for editors to work on versions of deleted articles in their userspace to try and get them up to the standard required. In this case, the editor in question has not been contributing for over a year and there is no need for them to have a page advertising themselves.-- Beloved Freak  19:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Lady Lashes
You might be interested in this. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Law Inforcement in Cape verde
could you help me with an article or should i just go to someone i know

could you help me with an article or should i just go to someone i know (Questchest (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC))
 * To be honest, I don't know much about the subject, but you could start by looking at similar articles like Law enforcement in Japan and South African Police Service. -- Beloved Freak  16:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Belovedfreak.
U don't have the right to offend me and saying i'am not currently using the page for ! --Huik01 (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that I have offended you Huik01, that wasn't my intention. I obviously misunderstood. I thought you had put the template on the article because you thought User:Adi4094 had asked you to, not because you were in the middle of editing the article. Sorry for any confusion. -- Beloved Freak  17:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, kinda confused me anyway. --Huik01 (talk) 18:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced
Just a quick question about Stone's Reach, what should be referenced on the article? The genre, or the (one line) lead? Thanks, and thanks for creating the Category. One day I'll create the other album's article.  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 17:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Basically, it has no references at all, so it needs something. There's nothing particularly contentious in it (although people might argue with genre - I say that hypothetically, I'm not familiar with the album). But it needs a reference to help verifiability. There's also nothing demonstrating notability at the moment. But at least I've learned something today, I'd never heard of melodic death metal before!-- Beloved Freak  17:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I added two references to the article, though they are from the same site. One day when the band gets bigger there will be more references.  Oh yeah melodic death metal's pretty intense. :)   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 17:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheLittlePrinceFilm.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheLittlePrinceFilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for getting back to me! I'll start filling in the edit summary no probs :) Will contact you if I need any help! Thank you for the offer! Orionsbelter (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. You'll see I have also replied to your post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. -- Beloved Freak  19:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I've got it cheers! Sorry about the flags thing too.... its the nerd in me I think (a chidhood passion!) Orionsbelter (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

How much do you think?
Danger Along the Ohio is now a stub article.How much would it need to become a start article?Can it now be a start article? Qwertyisbest (talk) 21:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have replied at your talkpage.-- Beloved [[User talk:Belovedfreak|Freak ]] 14:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

What would you grade Danger Along The Ohio?
What would you think it's graded?

Help with dermatology-related content
I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our Bolognia push!? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Master editors
Hey bro who the hell you think you are trying to delete an article that im writing about a well know community crew ? --Master editors (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC) I want an answer and I want it now.--Master editors (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * As it stands, the article does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject and as such meets Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you want to write an article about a group of people, you need to say why they meet notability guidelines.-- Beloved Freak  21:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well only if you would let me write about them then you would know how they meet the notability guidelines. --Master editors (talk) 04:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If have read the notability guidelines and are sure that this group meets them, then why don't you start by writing the article on your userpage, that way it won't be deleted straight away if it's not immediately up to scratch. Are there any newspaper articles about them or anything like that? That's the sort of thing that helps demonstrate notability. Regards, -- Beloved Freak  11:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Belovedfreak! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jonathan Lewis Owen -

DYK
I fixed the problem. Joe Chill (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, looks good to go now. -- Beloved Freak  23:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Emerald Warriors
I was planning on finishing formatting the refs today but I see you got there ahead of me. I appreciate the help, thanks! G ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 10:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. It's an interesting article & it will be nice to see it at DYK.-- Beloved Freak  11:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I was looking for rugby stubs to expand for a DYK, I thought that would make a good one. G ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 09:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Medal
Hi, I see you recently hit 25 DYKs so heres an award! keep up the good work! G ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 22:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Danger Along Ohio
I saw that Danger Along the Ohio needs help because of sources have like reviews the then where you find it but it does not have help I Qwertyismykeyboard (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC) that and that's how i did it help it do it how's it should be. Qwertyismykeyboard (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Memo Gracida
I've added sources to the Memo Gracida article. Can you take a look and see if they're up to standard?

Also, can you tell me why the fair use image was removed?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memo_Gracida

GrantGannon (talk) 23:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks a lot better. It still needs some more references, although I haven't read all the sources in detail, so either you need more sources, or just more citations within the article. All the personal info needs citing, and anything really that could be challenged by a reader. The reader needs to be able to go and check facts by following the references we provide. This is especially important because he is a living person, so sourcing needs to be spot on. (see Biographies of living persons for more info).


 * I removed the picture because it's a non-free image, and it doesn't qualify as fair use if it's used in a biography of a living person. This is because it should be possible to obtain a free image of someone who is still living. Under "Unacceptable Use of Images" it says "A magazine or book cover, to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover." It could be used to illustrate an article about that magazine, but not the person on the cover. Hope this helps. -- Beloved Freak  23:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Discussion invitation
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

(refactored) That is the coolest barnstar! Ikip 04:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Anti-Catholicism_in_literature_and_media
I was both kind to a noob and, at the same time, bold in editing. I merged the material from Catholics on television to the above article. A merger keeps a probable and viable search term, rather than redirection or deletion. It also makes the larger article reflect a worldwide view, rather than merely a US-centric vision. I hope you do not mind. Bearian (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, if that's what you think best. Thanks for telling me.-- Beloved Freak  13:42, 31 January 2010 (UTC)