User talk:Belovedfreak/Archive 7

Thank you...
...for your kind support of me as a coordinator! I look forward to helping WikiProject Films move forward. Hope you have been doing well! — Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Film/Did you know
Not sure if I already mentioned it, but thank you for the updates you do here, as well as your article contributions in this area. Cirt (talk) 12:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah, you're doing fine. Cirt (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Adopt me please.
Hey, i guess i want you to adopt me. Would that be cool? StephenHjellum13 21:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks
Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence §  t / e  18:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

adoption
definately interested in being "adopted", thank you - dealing with family crisis at the moment so very limited time. But will get back to you soon. thanks again. Rosabibi--Rosabibi (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Raz Adoti
Hi Belovedfreak,

Hope you're well.

I've created Raz Adoti's page; you'll see that he's notable. I was wondering whether you could reformat the references to include the footnotes, and to basically oversee the page for improvements (contents box, external links etc).

Thanks,

Have a good week,

Best,

Tegan Summer (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

My RfA...
 Thank you... ...for your participation in my RFA, which closed with 85 supports, 2 neutrals and 1 oppose. I'm extremely grateful for all the the kind comments from so many brilliant Wikipedians I've come to respect and admire, as well as many others I've not yet had the pleasure of working with, and I'll do my best to put my shiny new mop and bucket to good use! Once again, thank you ;) EyeSerene talk 17:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Peer review for Mulholland Dr.
Hi there, and thanks again. I appreciate (really!) taking apart the article. I think it's funny because I get all huffy at first, then I calm down and change it, and it's usually is a lot better. I can't ever seem to skip the huffy step, though. I appreciate your input. Anything else you can think of that needs changing, please suggest away. --Moni3 (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Razaaq Adoti
Hi,

Thanks for the edits and comments on Razaaq Adoti; this attempt was easier :).

Have a great week,

Best

Tegan Summer (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Samuel Ameobi
Hi. :) I just wanted to let you know that I have removed the speedy tag from this article to let the AfD play out. The reason I've done so is that there seem to be serious notability concerns about this individual. My removal of this tag isn't meant to disagree that the article has insufficient content, but was done because of the specific larger concerns in this issue and my belief that settling that question may be of more value than a quick deletion in this case. If this article is deleted as "no content" and recreated with sufficient content, a new AfD would have to be launched to determine notability. If the AfD closes as it looks likely to at this point, the article will be protected against recreation by WP:CSD until and unless notability can be properly established. I think allowing the AfD to proceed may ultimately save Wikipedia time. If you want to talk about my reasoning, please feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

page redirects
hello. i was wondering if there was a clever and efficient way of determining any redirects on a given page without clicking through every one? --emerson7 22:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * yes is an example. after gathering all the names into an article or template like this one, is there a way to determine if the good links (not the redlinks) point to dabs or redirects without manually checking each. --emerson7 22:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * thank you so very much....that's exactly what i've been seeking. cheers! --emerson7 23:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The Laramie Project

 * There is nothing wrong with them having their own articles. But, the articles were just stubs ...and have been for a long time. Until someone takes the time to work on them, I believe they are best served merged into an omnibus article. If you want to make them B-class or better on their own, OK. But, it is easier to maintain if they are all together. And, easier to fight off an AfD. My Wiki-philosophy is mergist: merge stubs into a central article until some one can spend the time and effort to expand. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a note, the entire content of the previous separate articles were copied into the omnibus article. Nothing has been lost or deleted. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

MDMA
No thanks. It was badly worded in a way that required a citation; I worded in a way that it did not. I'm an experienced Wikipeadian, please and thanks. Scientz (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Granted. I stand by my claim, and offer the plea that there will be no "reliable" (i.e., "published" sources) that detail the unpleasant, nasal passage ripping effects of insufflating MDMA. The bottom line is, as much as "original research" is a valid guideline, sometimes common sense must be employed for the purposes of completeness. There are three choices here, as I see it. 1) Simply leave the "citation needed" tag there ad infinitum as there will never be a published source detailing these effects; 2) accept the OR-tinged personal experience of a someone who has on several occasions insufflated both cocaine and MDMA (cocaine having no unpleasant effects on the sinuses, MDMA feeling like inhaling powdered glass); or 3) remove the section altogether in favor of better wording. As an inclusionist, I prefer choice 2, and such, I have reverted my edit. Scientz (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Rfa thanks
Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 04:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Tanzania/In the news/Wikinews
Kinds sparse, w/ some really older entries. We'd always love more contributors about Tanzania at Wikinews, if you're interested. Cirt (talk) 12:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me know if you need any help/advice. Cirt (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Gatt
Hi Beloved Freak,

I think I messed up the references on Joseph Gatt.

Can you take a quick look and see where I went wrong please? I attempted to format them with the written foootnotes (your preferred style).

Thanks

Tegan Summer (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Gatt
''Hi there, I see CactusWriter beat me to it. Glad to see you're carrying on creating new articles!''

Thanks anyway! :)

Have a great weekend. Tegan Summer (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

ADOPTION!
I'm interested in being adopted. You seem like a smart, all-around good Wikipedian, and I want to know if you'd like to adopt me! Thanks! Connorflanagan (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

deleted
I added a delete temple to the article without realising that it was already deleted by another user. It is sometimes hard to tell when I use Twinkle! (Anti-Vandal Tool)--Megapen (talk) 19:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA
 Hello Belovedfreak, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you!  weburiedoursecrets inthegarden  20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)