User talk:Ben515

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 00:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Contributions
Hi "Ben". I don't want to sound harsh, because I don't know your personal situation, but your spelling is bad enough that your contributions have so far had little value. As an example, your contribution to the nuclear weapons article:
 * and haveing harmefull radiation stay in the radious of the explosinon, this radiation can cous numerous deseaseis that can result in death, this radiation can last fo many years and its efects seen in futer generations.

Marked up for just basic spelling and grammar, it would look like this:
 * and hav e ing harm e ful l radiation stay [which would be?] in the radi o us of the explosi n on, this radiation can cous cause numerous deseaseis diseases that can result in death, this radiation can last fo r many years and its ef f ects seen in futer future generations.

The above corrections do not take into account the redundancy of saying "this radiation" twice after introducing it as a subject, nor does it take into account whether or not that addition is factually correct ("in the radius of the explosion" is vague; the radiation penetates further than the fireball does, sometimes further than the blast radius itself, depending on the bomb conditions). I am not writing this in order to be chastising or moralizing, but just to point out why your contributions have so far all been reverted, and probably will be in the future if they are like the above. --Fastfission 01:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Lkjhgfdsa 16:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Stephen Colbert on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Gdo01 03:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Category:World War II operations and battles of Europe. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Gdo01 03:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)