User talk:BenAriAtMicrosoft

Welcome

 * }

Speedy deletion

 * Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting.


 * For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
 * Sourcing is incredibly important for an encyclopedia. Be sure to list your sources at the bottom of the article.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
 * Other helpful pages are--


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * How to write a great article
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages


 * Tutorial
 * Biographies of living persons
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/sandbox and consider using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
 * Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim  19:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Portcullis Systems


A tag has been placed on Portcullis Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Help restore page about PortCullis?
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.

Please read Verifiability, Identifying reliable sources, No original research, Neutral point of view and Notability. Do not move on to the next stage until you have read all the above articles.

Once you finished reading them, if you still think your article is notable contact User:Marasmusine and politely ask him to "userify" the article. Fleet Command (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Application Request Routing
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Application Request Routing, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.iis.net/downloads/microsoft/application-request-routing.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Application Request Routing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Application Request Routing, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.iis.net/downloads/microsoft/application-request-routing, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Application Request Routing and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Application Request Routing, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Application Request Routing with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Application Request Routing. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Application Request Routing saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Hut 8.5 17:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * If you do own the copyright to this text then you will need to follow the steps here to prove that before we can use it in an article. I'm afraid we can't just take your word for it. Hut 8.5 17:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * It doesn't look as though you've completely rewritten the text. For instance your rewrite says the subject is designed for improving reliability and scalability for web applications by performing rule-baser routing of requests, as well as distributed disk caching and client affinity. Compare that to the source, which says increase Web application scalability and reliability through rule-based routing, client and host name affinity ... of HTTP server requests, and distributed disk caching. While the words have been moved around the sentence structure is basically the same. The result is a close paraphrase, which I'm afraid we can't use. The material needs to be rewritten from scratch. Hut 8.5 19:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, I've replaced the article with your version. Hut 8.5 10:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573673603 your edit] to Windows Server 2012 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * * IIS 8.5, which includes several performance and logging enhancements . [http://aka.ms/IntroWinServ2012R2Preview/PDFebook Introducing  Windows  Server 2012 R2

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/BenAriAtMicrosoft. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 11:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * First of all, in relation to this comment, I would draw your attention to our WP:COI guidance. You should not have bene editing that page directly, and should have declared your conflict of interest and used edit requests on its talk page instead.
 * More serious, however, is the fact that you created two alternative accounts and continued editing the same articles using them. I can not think of any reasons you would do that and then deny it, unless you were attempting to evade scrutiny, or to pass yourself off as multiple people to give your edits additional weight. None of this is permissible (see WP:SOCK for more on this). If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to agree to limit yourself to a single account, to verify that you are who you say you are (there are instructions on this at WP:REALNAME), to make the proper COI declarations, and to desist from editing our article about yourself directly. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)